Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Drummond would imply that, as matter has no promise or potency of
life and is not responsible for being without life (or “dead,” to
use his misleading word), and if it ever is to live must wait for
the life‐giving influence to come unsought, so the human soul is
not responsible for being spiritually dead, cannot seek for life,
must passively wait for the Spirit. Plymouth Brethren generally
hold the same view with Drummond, that regeneration _adds_
something—as _vitality_—to the substance of the soul. Christ is
transsubstantiated into the soul’s substance; or, the πνεῦμα is
added. But we have given over talking of vitality, as if it were a
substance or faculty. We regard it as merely a mode of action.
Evolution, moreover, uses what already exists, so far as it will
go, instead of creating new; as in the miracle of the loaves, and
as in the original creation of man, so in his recreation or
regeneration. Dr. Charles Hodge also makes the same mistake in
calling regeneration an “origination of the principle of the
spirit of life, just as literal and real a creation as the
origination of the principle of natural life.” This, too,
literalizes Scripture metaphor, and ignores the fact that the
change accomplished in regeneration is an exclusively moral one.
There is indeed a new entrance of Christ into the soul, or a new
exercise of his spiritual power within the soul. But the effect of
Christ’s working is not to add any new faculty or substance, but
only to give new direction to already existing powers.
(_b_) Regeneration involves an enlightenment of the understanding and a
rectification of the volitions. But it seems most consonant with Scripture
and with a correct psychology to regard these changes as immediate and
necessary consequences of the change of disposition already mentioned,
rather than as the primary and central facts in regeneration. The taste
for truth logically precedes perception of the truth, and love for God
logically precedes obedience to God; indeed, without love no obedience is
possible. Reverse the lever of affection, and this moral locomotive,
without further change, will move away from sin, and toward truth and God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account