Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of InfantryBalck, W. (William)
History
Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of Infantry
Balck, W. (William)
Military art and science; Tactics
The conduct of the advance guard of the 8th Infantry Division
at =Beaumont= is worthy of imitation. In this case, the support
battalion was deployed and the artillery went into position; strong
detachments were retained in rear of the left wing until the main
body had arrived. Likewise, a proper relation existed between
frontage (4 battalions on a front of 1400 m.) and distribution in
depth. According to the General Staff Account of the Franco-German
war (II, p. 1045), the distribution was as follows:
_First line_: 4th Jäger-Battalion, which was subsequently reinforced
by the IInd Battalion, 96th Infantry and the Ist and IInd Battalions,
86th Infantry.
_Support for the Artillery_: Füsilier Battalion, 96th Infantry.
_Reserve_: IIIrd Battalion, 86th Infantry.
We have already mentioned the deployment of the advance guard at
=Spicheren= (p. 226 supra). In that instance the whole force was
thrown in at once, whereas at =Beaumont= the deployment of the
different units was coördinated and proceeded systematically. An
advance guard should be able to repulse an attack and then assume the
offensive without outside assistance. An example which is not worthy
of imitation is the engagement of the 29th Infantry Brigade at the
=Hallue=. The brigade began the fight, without being compelled to do
so, and deployed its 4530 men on a front of 5000 m. The 30th Infantry
Brigade (4070 men) then entered the fight and deployed on a front
of 3000 m. in prolongation of the line of the 29th Brigade. If the
French had made a decisive attack at this point, the 15th Infantry
Division would not have been able to repulse it.
Distribution in depth, for the purpose of warding off an enveloping
movement and for making a counter-attack, is more necessary in defense
than in attack; besides, a greater front may be covered in the former
case on account of the smaller losses. The following factors in part
determine the extent of front to be occupied and the number of troops
required to defend it: (1) the strength, natural or artificial, of the
position; (2) obstacles in its front; (3) salient angles which can be
easily enveloped; (4) the intentions of the commander (_i.e._, whether
he contemplates fighting a purely defensive combat or one including
offensive action).
=Delaying actions= are usually fought at long and medium ranges as
purely passive defensive combats and no provision is made for replacing
casualties, the object of the fight being to avoid a decision. Few
men should, therefore, be placed in the firing line, but these should
be supplied with abundant ammunition. However, as the force desires
to avoid a decisive engagement by withdrawing, distribution in depth
should be provided to protect the flanks and to facilitate breaking off
the action. (Par. 419 German I. D. R.). This requires that distances be
great.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account