Talks on Manures: A Series of Familiar and Practical Talks Between the Author and the Deacon, the Doctor, and Other Neighbors, on the Whole SubjectHarris, Joseph
Science
Talks on Manures: A Series of Familiar and Practical Talks Between the Author and the Deacon, the Doctor, and Other Neighbors, on the Whole Subject
Harris, Joseph
Fertilizers; Manures
“Perhaps not,” said my father, “but we have got to do something for the
land, or the crops will be poor, and poor crops do not pay these times.
What would you use instead of lime?” --“Lime is not a manure, strictly
speaking,” said I; “a bushel to the acre would furnish all the lime the
crops require, even if there was not an abundant supply already in the
soil. If you mix lime with guano, it sets free the ammonia; and when you
mix lime with the soil it probably decomposes some compounds containing
ammonia or the elements of ammonia, and thus furnishes a supply of
ammonia for the plants. I think it would be cheaper to buy ammonia in
the shape of Peruvian guano.”
After dinner, my father asked me to take a walk over the farm. We came
to a field of barley. Standing at one end of the field, about the
middle, he asked me if I could see any difference in the crop. “Oh,
yes,” I replied, “the barley on the right-hand is far better than on the
left hand. The straw is stiffer and brighter, and the heads larger and
heavier. I should think the right half of the field will be ten bushels
per acre better than the other.”
“So I think,” he said, “and now can you tell me why?” --“Probably you
manured one half the field for turnips, and not the other half.” --“No.”
--“You may have drawn off the turnips from half the field, and fed them
off by sheep on the other half.” --“No, both sides were treated
precisely alike.” --I gave it up --“Well,” said he, “this half the
field on the right-hand was limed, thirty years ago, and that is the
only reason I know for the difference. And now you need not tell me that
lime does not pay.”
I can well understand how this might happen. The system of rotation
adopted was, 1st clover, 2d wheat, 3d turnips, 4th barley, seeded with
clover.
Now, you put on, say 150 bushels of lime for wheat. After the wheat the
land is manured and sown with turnips. The turnips are eaten off on the
land by sheep; and it is reasonable to suppose that on the half of the
field dressed with lime there would be a much heavier crop of turnips.
These turnips being eaten off by the sheep would furnish more manure for
this half than the other half. Then again, when the land was in grass or
clover, the limed half would afford more and sweeter grass and clover
than the other half, and the sheep would remain on it longer. They would
eat it close into the ground, going only on to the other half when they
could not get enough to eat on the limed half. More of their droppings
would be left on the limed half of the field. The lime, too, would
continue to act for several years; but even after all direct benefit
from the lime had ceased, it is easy to understand why the crops might
be better for a long period of time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account