Talks on Manures: A Series of Familiar and Practical Talks Between the Author and the Deacon, the Doctor, and Other Neighbors, on the Whole SubjectHarris, Joseph
Science
Talks on Manures: A Series of Familiar and Practical Talks Between the Author and the Deacon, the Doctor, and Other Neighbors, on the Whole Subject
Harris, Joseph
Fertilizers; Manures
“Do you think lime would do any good,” asked the Deacon, “on our
limestone land?”--I certainly do. So far as I have seen, it does just as
much good here in Western New York, as it did on my father’s farm.
I should use it very freely if we could get it cheap enough--but we are
charged from 25 to 30 cts. a bushel for it, and I do not think at these
rates it will pay to use it. Even gold may be bought too dear.
“You should burn your own lime,” said the Deacon, “you have plenty of
limestone on the farm, and could use up your down wood.”--I believe it
would pay me to do so, but one man cannot do everything. I think if
farmers would use more lime for manure we should get it cheaper. The
demand would increase with competition, and we should soon get it at its
real value. At 10 to 15 cents a bushel, I feel sure that we could use
lime as a manure with very great benefit.
“I was much interested some years ago,” said the Doctor, “in the results
of Prof. Way’s investigations in regard to the absorptive powers of
soils.”
His experiments, since repeated and confirmed by other chemists, formed
a new epoch in agricultural chemistry. They afforded some new
suggestions in regard to how lime may benefit land.
Prof. Way found that ordinary soils possessed the power of separating,
from solution in water, the different earthy and alkaline substances
presented to them in manure; thus, when solutions of salts of ammonia,
of potash, magnesia, etc., were made to filter slowly through a bed of
dry soil, five or six inches deep, arranged in a flower-pot, or other
suitable vessel, it was observed that the liquid which ran through, no
longer contained any of the ammonia or other salt employed. The soil
had, in some form or other, retained the alkaline substance, while the
water in which it was previously dissolved passed through.
Further, this power of the soil was found not to extend to the whole
salt of ammonia or potash, but only to the alkali itself. If, for
instance, sulphate of ammonia were the compound used in the experiments,
the ammonia would be removed from solution, but the filtered liquid
would contain sulphuric acid in abundance--not in the free or uncombined
form, but united to lime; instead of sulphate of ammonia we should find
sulphate of lime in the solution; and this result was obtained, whatever
the acid of the salt experimented upon might be.
It was found, moreover, that the process of filtration was by no means
necessary; by the mere mixing of an alkaline solution with a proper
quantity of soil, as by shaking them together in a bottle, and allowing
the soil to subside, the same result was obtained. The action,
therefore, was in no way referable to any physical law brought into
operation by the process of filtration.
It was also found that the combination between the soil and the alkaline
substance was rapid, if not instantaneous, partaking of the nature of
the ordinary union between an acid and an alkali.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account