Tantalus : $b or, The future of ManSchiller, F. C. S. (Ferdinand Canning Scott)
Philosophy
Tantalus : $b or, The future of Man
Schiller, F. C. S. (Ferdinand Canning Scott)
Civilization; Eugenics
On the other hand there does seem to be a science from the possible
progress of which something of a sensational kind might not
unreasonably be expected. It is, moreover, the science most directly
concerned with affairs of this sort. Psychology, the science of human
mentality, is, by common consent, in a deplorably backward state. It
has remained a ground for metaphysical excursions and a playground for
the arbitrary pedantries of classificatory systematists. Its efforts
to become scientific have only led it to ape assumptions and to borrow
notions found to be appropriate in sciences with widely different
problems and objects. The results, as the psychologists themselves
confess, are meagre and disappointing; which, of course, only proves
that the borrowed notions are inappropriate and incapable of making
Psychology into an effective science. But if psychologists should
take it into their heads to settle down to business, to recognize
the primary obligation of every science to develop methods and
conceptions capable of working upon its subject-matter, and so tried
to authenticate their ‘truth’ after the ordinary fashion of the other
sciences, namely by the pragmatic test of successful working, some
surprising effects might be elicited even from the actual human mind.
For there is reason to suppose that its present organization is very
far from being the best of which it is capable. It has come about in a
very haphazard manner, and we are not at present making anything like
an adequate use of all our powers. Hence by changing the gearing and
re-arranging the traditional coupling, so to speak, of our faculties,
improvements might conceivably be wrought which would seem to us to
border on the miraculous. Thus a pragmatically efficient Psychology
might actually invert the miracle of Circe, and really transform the
Yahoo into a man.
X
I have endeavoured in this very summary sketch to show that the doom of
Tantalus is by no means unconditional, and that he can save himself if
he chooses, and that by no superhuman effort, but merely by recognizing
facts that are right before his nose and well within his comprehension,
and by a little clear thinking upon their import. But I would not
presume to predict that he _will_ save himself: history affords no
unambiguous guide. It seems to show that something worse and something
better than what actually happens is always conceivable, and that
neither our hopes nor our fears are ever fully realized. If so, poor
Tantalus, hoping against hope, fearing against reason, may muddle along
for a good while yet, without repeating either his ancient error of
imagining that he could sup with the gods, or his modern folly of using
his reason, as Goethe’s Mephistopheles declared, only to become more
bestial than any beast!
FOOTNOTES:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account