Taxonomic Status of Some Mice of The Peromyscus boylii Group in Eastern Mexico, With Description of a New SubspeciesAlvarez, Ticul
Science
Taxonomic Status of Some Mice of The Peromyscus boylii Group in Eastern Mexico, With Description of a New Subspecies
Alvarez, Ticul
Mice
_Diagnosis._--Size medium for the genus (see measurements); tail
about as long as head and body; dorsal coloration near Sayal
Brown (capitalized color terms after Ridgway, 1912); sides
reddish; underparts Light Buff; tail bicolored but not
distinctly so; supraorbital border of skull angular, and bullae
pointed anteriorly; anterior half of braincase nearly straight
(not rounded) as viewed from above; upper molar series long
(4.7-5.0); incisive foramina short in relation to length of
skull.
_Comparisons._--From _Peromyscus boylii_, _P. aztecus_ differs
as follows: Larger in most parts measured; maxillary tooth-row
4.7-5.0 instead of 4.0-4.6; color brighter on sides (reddish
instead of ochraceous); supraorbital border angular instead of
rounded; anterior border of zygomatic plate convex in upper half
and almost straight in lower half as opposed to nearly straight
throughout in _boylii_; pterygoid fossa broader; bullae more
pointed anteriorly and less inflated; mesostyles of upper molars
larger; surface between orbital region and nasals convex in
lateral view instead of flat.
_Remarks._--When Saussure (1860:105) described _P. aztecus_ he did not
designate a type or type locality. Osgood (1909:157) designated as
lectotype the mounted specimen, in the Geneva Museum, which has the
skull inside and of which Saussure figured the molar teeth. Osgood
(_loc. cit._) examined one of the three specimens (No. 3926 USNM) that
Saussure used in describing _P. aztecus_ and found that it agreed "in
every respect with recently collected specimens from Mirador, Veracruz,
which, in the lack of exact knowledge, may be assumed to be the type
locality, as it is certain that some at least of Saussure's specimens
were taken near there."
[Illustration: FIG. 1. Two species of _Peromyscus_.
1. _P. boylii ambiguus_
2. _P. boylii beatae_
3. _P. boylii levipes_
4. _P. aztecus_ (triangles)]
Osgood regarded _P. aztecus_ as a subspecies of _P. boylii_ because of
the resemblance between _aztecus_ and _P. b. evides_, but _evides_ is
far removed geographically (occurring only in western México) from
_aztecus_, and is smaller. _P. aztecus_ is larger than any known
subspecies of _P. boylii_, and is not known to intergrade with _P. b.
levipes_ or _P. b. beatae_ (with which _aztecus_ occurs sympatrically at
Jalapa, Veracruz), the two subspecies of _boylii_ that are found nearest
the geographic range of _P. aztecus_. Also, as mentioned previously,
_aztecus_ possesses distinctive characters that distinguish it from all
subspecies of _boylii_. For these reasons I regard _aztecus_ as a
distinct species.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account