Communism -- Soviet Union; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
“The officers will not work with our Committees, they betray us to the
enemy, they apply the death penalty to our agitators; and the
counter-revolutionary Government supports them. We thought that the
Revolution would bring peace. But now the Government forbids us even to
talk of such things, and at the same time doesn’t give us enough food
to live on, or enough ammunition to fight with….”
From Europe came rumours of peace at the expense of Russia. (See App.
II, Sect. 6)…
News of the treatment of Russian troops in France added to the
discontent. The First Brigade had tried to replace its officers with
Soldiers’ Committees, like their comrades at home, and had refused an
order to go to Salonika, demanding to be sent to Russia. They had been
surrounded and starved, and then fired on by artillery, and many
killed. (See App. II, Sect. 7)…
On October 29th I went to the white-marble and crimson hall of the
Marinsky palace, where the Council of the Republic sat, to hear
Terestchenko’s declaration of the Government’s foreign policy, awaited
with such terrible anxiety by all the peace-thirsty and exhausted land.
A tall, impeccably-dressed young man with a smooth face and high
cheek-bones, suavely reading his careful, non-committal speech. (See
App. II, Sect. 8) Nothing…. Only the same platitudes about crushing
German militarism with the help of the Allies—about the “state
interests” of Russia, about the “embarrassment” caused by Skobeliev’s
_nakaz._ He ended with the key-note:
“Russia is a great power. Russia will remain a great power, whatever
happens. We must all defend her, we must show that we are defenders of
a great ideal, and children of a great power.”
Nobody was satisfied. The reactionaries wanted a “strong” imperialist
policy; the democratic parties wanted an assurance that the Government
would press for peace…. I reproduce an editorial in _Rabotchi i Soldat_
(Worker and Soldier), organ of the Bolshevik Petrograd Soviet:
THE GOVERNMENT’S ANSWER TO THE TRENCHES
The most taciturn of our Ministers, Mr. Terestchenko, has actually told
the trenches the following:
1. We are closely united with our Allies. (Not with the peoples, but
with the Governments.)
2. There is no use for the democracy to discuss the possibility or
impossibility of a winter campaign. That will be decided by the
Governments of our Allies.
3. The 1st of July offensive was beneficial and a very happy affair.
(He did not mention the consequences.)
4. It is not true that our Allies do not care about us. The Minister
has in his possession very important declarations. (Declarations? What
about deeds? What about the behaviour of the British fleet? (See App.
II, Sect. 9) The parleying of the British king with exiled
counter-revolutionary General Gurko? The Minister did not mention all
this.)
5. The _nakaz_ to Skobeliev is bad; the Allies don’t like it and the
Russian diplomats don’t like it. In the Allied Conference we must all
‘speak one language.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account