World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Influence; World War, 1914-1918 -- Peace
When I went about Europe I was dismayed by the denial of all mental
progress towards a state of peace. Physically there was a slow recovery
from war. Morally there was a reaction in many countries to black
passion, militarism, and ideas of Force. Austria-Hungary and Germany
were swinging right back to the old traditions of nationalism. They saw
no way of freedom except by future war. They desired vengeance—against
the French. They were talking of calling back their Emperors. In
Germany the Crown Prince came home as a “private citizen” ready for
a call to the throne at some not distant date. The war which was to
make the world safe for democracy had been followed by a peace in which
democracy was repudiated by many leaders and by public opinion in
many countries. “I do not believe in democracy,” Herr Streseman told
me in Berlin. The Italian Fascists under Mussolini did not believe in
democracy, nor in Parliamentary institutions, nor in free speech. They
bludgeoned men who disagreed with their ideas and methods or poured
castor oil down their throats. They saved Italy from anarchy, which was
a good deed, but Mussolini, the autocrat, was quite willing to play
the anarchist against international laws, and did so when he flouted
the League of Nations and bombarded Corfu. Students of world affairs,
thoughtful observers like Sir Edward Grey and General Smuts, men not
given to exaggerated speech and morbid fears, expressed their alarm
at the state of Europe ten years after the outbreak of the world war,
and confessed that it seemed to be slipping downhill towards general
catastrophe.
THE REVIVAL OF HOPE
Since then something has happened to change the outlook of Europe and
renew the hopes of peace. It is the London Agreement by which Germany,
France, Great Britain, Belgium, and Italy agreed on Saturday, August
16—ten years and fourteen days after the beginning of the world war—to
accept the chief provisions of the Dawes Report for the restoration
of German credit by international loans and to establish a business
settlement of the reparations problem with German consent. As Ramsay
MacDonald, Labour Prime Minister, said at the conclusion of the London
Conference, this agreement was “the first Peace Treaty” since the end
of the world conflict, “because we sign it with a feeling that we have
turned our backs on the terrible years of war and war mentality.”
Three great events in the political world led up to this new hope of
peace and progress. The first was the friendly co-operation of the
United States in the endeavour to find a business solution on the
subject of German reparations. The second was the advent of a Labour
Government in England. The third was the downfall of Poincaré, owing to
a change of view in France which put Herriot into power as an opponent
of the Poincaré school of thought.
AMERICAN IDEALISM
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account