Text book of veterinary medicine, Volume 4 (of 5)Law, James
Science
Text book of veterinary medicine, Volume 4 (of 5)
Law, James
Veterinary medicine
Inoculation with a minimum dose usually results in local abscess only.
_Diagnosis._ From _emphysematous anthrax_, with which malignant œdema is
most likely to be confounded, it is to be distinguished by its
appearance anywhere outside the black quarter areas, by the immunity of
cattle which are so obnoxious to emphysematous anthrax, by the
susceptibility of man, who does not contract black quarter, by the
formation of the spore near the middle of the bacillus in place of at
one end, by its resistance to the action of ordinary disinfectants, and
by the greater tendency to form filaments.
From _anthrax_ it is differentiated by its appearance outside the
anthrax localities, by the absence of the bacillus from the blood and
from the surface layers of the skin, by the normal size of the spleen,
and by the active motility of the bacillus. It cannot be cultivated like
anthrax in the free air or on the surface of culture media, and unlike
anthrax bacillus, its cultures produce bubbles or gas.
_Treatment._ This is essentially surgical and consists in free incisions
to admit air freely to all parts of the œdematous tissue, perfect
drainage and a liberal use of peroxide of hydrogen. Other disinfectants
may be employed but are much less promising. The free disinfection of
the adjacent skin is an important element in treatment.
_Prevention._ This consists essentially in the thorough disinfection of
all accidental and surgical wounds, the careful cleansing and antisepsis
of the skin before an operation, the exclusion of earth, manure, or
water from driven wells or fountains, from all wounds, and above all the
exclusion of proteus vulgaris, and micrococcus prodigiosus.
_Immunity_ may be secured by a first, non-fatal attack of the disease.
INFECTIOUS FEVERS OF SWINE.
One name for several affections. Differentiation, swine erysipelas,
hog cholera and swine plague. Complex infections. Effects of large,
medium and small doses, of more or less potent germ, of greater or
less susceptibility.
Until comparatively recent years the various infectious fevers of swine
have been confounded and described as a single disease, the name varying
in the different countries in which they were observed. In America it
was _Hog Cholera_; in England, _Swine Fever_; in France, _Rouget_; and
in Germany, _Schweineseuche_. A closer study showed a marked tendency to
a particular class of lesions in different epizoötics, and
bacteriological research associated plagues in given localities with
different microbes, so that progress has been made in differentiating
one from another to a certain extent.
The first clear distinction was made in setting aside the swine
erysipelas (rouget, rothlauf,) from the rest as distinguished at once by
its small, delicate bacillus, differing notably from the others in its
staining and cultural peculiarities, as well as in the predominance of
the cutaneous lesions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account