The 42nd (East Lancashire) Division 1914-1918Gibbon, Frederick P.
History
The 42nd (East Lancashire) Division 1914-1918
Gibbon, Frederick P.
Great Britain. Army. Division, 42nd; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
Later the Divisional Squadron of the D.L.O. Yeomanry rejoined the
Division, and the 3rd Dismounted Brigade, mainly Yeomanry, was also
attached.
It is unnecessary to refer to the importance of the Suez Canal, not
merely to the commerce of the Empire, but also to the policy and strategy
of the Allies. But it may be well to explain here, very briefly and
roughly, the general situation so far as it affected the defence of
this main communication between East and West. Prior to the outbreak of
war there were British frontier posts in Sinai as far east as El Arish
on the coast about ninety miles due east of Port Said, and more than a
hundred miles by road from the Canal. The sole purpose of these posts
was to supervise and regulate traffic between Egypt and the Turkish
Empire, and as such traffic automatically ceased on the outbreak of
war with Turkey, the handful of troops was withdrawn. The invasion of
Gallipoli had compelled the Turks to abandon for a time any idea they
may have entertained of conquering Egypt. Now, at the beginning of 1916,
although the withdrawal of the Allies from the Dardanelles and the entry
of Bulgaria into the war on the side of her ancient enemy had set free a
large Turkish army for employment in Asia, the situation had not greatly
changed. The heavy losses sustained in Gallipoli had been a serious drain
upon the finest troops of the Ottoman Empire; the Russians had entered
Armenia victoriously, and it was not possible for Turkey to prepare and
equip new armies to arrest the Russian progress and at the same time to
cross the Desert of Sinai with any reasonable prospect of success. For,
if the evacuation of Gallipoli had released a large Turkish force for
offensive purposes, it had done no less for the British, and the conquest
of Egypt was still a remote possibility only. But, as the Turks had been
improving their communications through Palestine, there remained the
probability that they might attempt to establish themselves in strength
within striking distance of the Canal. They hoped that a successful
attack here might bring about a rebellion in Egypt. While the Egyptians
remained passive spectators there was no chance of a Turkish victory.
[Sidenote: _Routes open to Enemy_]
There are three routes by which a hostile force might approach the Canal.
(1) The northern caravan route along the coast through El Arish to
Kantara, the route by which Joseph’s brethren, and later the Holy Family,
and in more recent times Napoleon, had travelled from Palestine to Egypt.
(2) The central Hassana—Ismailia route.
(3) The southern Akaba—Suez route.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account