In studying the connection between the different lines in the spectrum
of an element, it is convenient to characterize a wave, not by its
wave-length, but by its “wave-number,” which means the number of waves
in a centimetre. Thus if the wave-length is one ten-thousandth of
a centimetre, the wave-number is 10,000; if the wave-length is one
hundred-thousandth of a centimetre, the wave-number is 100,000, and
so on. The shorter the wave-length, the greater is the wave-number.
The laws of the spectrum are simpler when they are stated in terms of
wave-numbers than when they are stated in terms of wave-lengths. The
wave-number is also sometimes called the “frequency,” but this term is
more properly employed to express the number of waves that pass a given
place in a second. This is obtained by multiplying the wave-number by
the number of centimetres that light travels in a second, i.e. thirty
thousand million. These three terms, wave-length, wave-number, and
frequency must be borne in mind in reading spectroscopic work.
In stating the law’s which determine the spectrum of an element, we
[Pg 44]
shall for the present confine ourselves to hydrogen, because for all
other elements the laws are less simple.
For many years no progress was made towards finding any connection
between the different lines in the spectrum of hydrogen. It was
supposed that there must be one fundamental line, and that the others
must be like harmonies in music. The atom was supposed to be in a
state of complicated vibration, which sent out light-waves having the
same frequencies that it had itself. Along these lines, however, the
relations between the different lines remained quite undiscoverable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account