What is known about other elements than hydrogen by means of the
spectroscope all goes to show that the same principles apply, and that,
when light is emitted, an electron jumps from an outer orbit to an
inner one. But when there are many electrons revolving round a single
[Pg 58]
nucleus, the mathematics becomes too difficult for our present powers,
and it is impossible to establish such exact and striking coincidences
of theory and observation as in the case of hydrogen. Nevertheless,
what is known is sufficient to place it beyond reasonable doubt that
the explanation of the spectrum of other elements is the same in
principle as in the case of hydrogen. There is one case which can be
tested to the full, and that is the case of positively electrified
helium, which has lost one electron and has only one left. This only
differs from hydrogen (as regards the movements of the electron) by the
fact that the charge on the nucleus is twice as great as that on the
electron, instead of being equal to it, as with hydrogen, and that the
mass of the nucleus is four times that of the hydrogen nucleus. The
changes which this produces in the spectrum, as compared with hydrogen,
are exactly such as theory would predict.
In the present chapter, we have seen what was the conclusion to which
Bohr was led as to possible states of the hydrogen atom, but we have
not yet seen what was the reasoning by which he was led to this
conclusion. In order to understand this reasoning, it is necessary to
explain what is called the theory of quanta, of which Bohr’s theory of
[Pg 59]
the atom is a special case. The theory of quanta will be the subject of
the next chapter.
[Pg 60]
VI.
THE THEORY OF QUANTA
THE theory that the energy of a body cannot vary continuously, but only
by a certain finite amount, or exact multiples of this amount, was not
originally derived from a study of the atom or the spectroscope, but
from the study of the radiation of heat. The theory was first suggested
by Planck in 1900, thirteen years before Bohr applied it to the atom.
Planck showed that it was necessary in order to account for the laws
of temperature radiation; roughly speaking, if bodies could part with
their warmth continuously, and not by jumps, they ought to grow colder
than they do, when they are not exposed to a source of heat. It would
take us too far from our subject to go into Planck’s reasoning, which
is somewhat abstruse. A good account of it in English will be found in
Jean’s Report on Radiation and the Quantum-Theory, published for
the Physical Society of London (1914).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account