THE facts known about the structure of nuclei are not sufficient to
enable us to be very definite as to the way in which they are built up.
Let us begin by setting forth the facts, and then see what is to be
inferred in the way of theory.
The most important facts for our purpose are those of radio-activity,
which we consider in the previous chapter. We know from these facts
that the nuclei of certain heavy atoms contain helium nuclei and
electrons; that the loss of a helium nucleus diminishes the atomic
number by two and the atomic weight by four, while the loss of an
electron increases the atomic number by one and has no appreciable
effect upon the atomic weight. We know also that it is possible for
several different elements to exist with the same atomic number, but
different atomic weights; in radio-activity these can be seen in
process of formation, but they are found to exist among lighter atoms
which show no discoverable trace of radio-activity. It is possible
[Pg 124]
that radio-activity, in a very slight degree, exists among elements
which appear to us perfectly stable; the amount of it may be so small
that we cannot hope to detect it. This may be the reason for the
existence of isotopes; but there is at present no positive evidence in
favour of this view.
Another fact of immense importance has been experimentally established
by Rutherford. Some elements, but not others, when submitted to a
very intense bombardment by -particles, give off rays which
are found to be hydrogen. The element in which this result has been
established with the greatest certainty is nitrogen (atomic number 17).
But it is also fairly certain as regards a number of elements—broadly
speaking, those which have odd atomic numbers. Rutherford is led to
the conclusion that hydrogen nuclei can be detached from the nuclei
of other elements, unless their atomic weight is a multiple of 4,
which is the atomic weight of helium. This, together with the fact that
in radio-activity helium nuclei, but not hydrogen nuclei, are thrown
off, leads irresistibly to the view that every nucleus is composed,
as far as it can be, of helium nuclei. Thus, phosphorus, which has
the atomic weight 31, may be supposed to consist of seven helium
nuclei, each having atomic weight 4, and three hydrogen nuclei,
[Pg 125]
each having atomic weight 1. The three hydrogen nuclei could, with
luck, be detached by bombardment, but the helium nuclei are to be
regarded as incapable of being destroyed by an -particle, so
that if they are detached they are detached as wholes. Consequently,
when the atomic weight divides by 4, the nucleus can be supposed
to consist wholly of helium nuclei, and there will be no odd hydrogen
nuclei to be broken off. It is impossible to know whether Rutherford’s
bombardment breaks off helium nuclei, because they could not be
distinguished from his projectiles, which are also helium nuclei.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account