You see at once that the secretion of the first hour is identical in
the two cases both as regards quantity and digestive power, and only in
the second is the secretory work differentiated according to the nature
of the food. How are we to explain the secretion which takes place at
the commencement? Is it not the same which we have already seen in the
sham feeding experiments? Is not this first onrush of the stream of
secretion the preliminary psychic juice? Unquestionably, gentlemen,
this is the case, and we may convince ourselves of the fact in the
most diverse ways. Above all, the following is clear: whatever occurs
in the so-called sham feeding cannot wholly be absent in the case of
normal feeding, since the former is nothing else than the isolated
commencement of normal digestion. This justifiable inference is fully
confirmed, if the secretion of the first hours after the administration
of flesh and bread be compared with that after simple sham feeding. In
the case of feeding with flesh and bread, the identically similar and
high digestive power of the first hourly portions is striking, and this
power coincides with what we have met in sham feeding. Further, if the
quantity of juice from the miniature stomach during the first hour be
compared with that produced by the non-resected part of the organ,--to
do which we must multiply it by ten, since the resected _cul-de-sac_
is approximately one-tenth of the whole organ,--it is here again found
that the quantity approximately corresponds to the mean values obtained
by sham feeding. Finally, the depression in digestive power or quantity
of juice (with flesh, decrease of digestive power; with bread, decline
in the quantity of juice), which sets in soon after the taking of food,
indicates that the two conditions are connected with the ingestion
of food--_i. e._, with a transitory factor which soon passes away
and gives place to other conditions. Our explanation becomes still
more convincing when we take into consideration the effects of other
foods. If you give the dog, for example, something else to eat which
does not interest it to the same degree as flesh or bread, you will
find the initial increase in quantity and strength of juice does not
appear. Offer the animal milk, for example, which in sham feeding,
especially if it does not last long, calls forth, as a rule, no
secretion, or at all events only very little, and the rapid flow of the
commencement--the already-mentioned initial rise--absolutely fails to
appear. You have already seen the figures which deal with this matter;
I think it necessary, however, to bring them forward again in order
that you may be better able to compare them with the secretion after
flesh and bread.
The dog was given 600 c.c. of milk (experiment by Dr. Chigin).
Hour. Quantity of juice. Digestive power.
1st 4.2 c.c. 3.57 mm.
2nd 12.4 ” 2.63 ”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account