During the time between the departure of the Romans and the coming of
the Saxons, the conversion of Scotland and Ireland was begun by the
Celts. Ninian, son of a British chief, after having a foreign
education, established a community at Whithorn in Scotland; while a
youth named Patrick, stolen from the Clyde by the slave traders, after
being taught in the schools of Tours, Auxerre and Terins, was, in due
time, consecrated Bishop of the Irish. Accompanied by twelve friends, he
landed where Wicklow now stands, in 432, and, after meeting with much
encouragement, established the See of Armagh. All this missionary work
may thus be attributed to British initiative as it is obvious the See of
Rome had little, if any, share therein. Adverse times fell upon the
British Church with the arrival of the Jutes in 449, the Saxons in 477,
and finally the Angles in 547. The Britons were driven westward, fearful
destruction fell on the church, and Paganism reigned again in Britain.
But, though scattered abroad, the Celts continued their missionary
work--established cathedrals and monastic foundations in Wales, _i.e._
Llandaff, A.D. 500, Bangor and St David’s, 540, and St Asaph, 570, Sees
which have had a continuous succession of bishops to the present day. St
Finian of Clonard established communities in Ireland; St Columba landed
in Scotland in 565 and founded a monastic house at Iona; and in West
Wales (Cornwall and Devonshire), Christian teaching was promoted. A
recent writer--F. H. Homes Dudden in _Gregory the Great_--says--
“The Welsh Church at this time was essentially a monastic church,
its whole organisation being built up round the monasteries. Its
bishops were members, usually abbots, of monastic establishments,
and they seem to have been non-diocesan. Its clergy also were
attached to the monasteries, built on monastic land, served by
monastic clergy, and called after the saint by whom the monastery
was founded.... Further, the constitution of this monastic church
was essentially tribal.... Every great monastic establishment was a
sort of spiritual clan, in which the abbot was chieftain, the
officials represented the heads of the tribal families, and the
monks were the tribesmen.... Thus, just as secular Wales consisted
of groups of tribesmen clustering round powerful lay chieftains, so
ecclesiastical Wales consisted of groups of tribesmen clustering
round a few great monasteries founded by important saints.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account