29. srpr C P. 238. At one time of some importance. Contained 3 houses "in memory of people now living and had been larger than that." Destroyed by flood in 1862. 30. tekta C P. 239. Kroeber states (p. 10) that _tekta_ had been occupied recently but did not seem to be an old site. This is directly contradicted by Waterman who calls it "an old town site." The name was frequently mentioned by his informants. Moreover he knew of a very old woman who was married from there as a girl and who "belongs" in _tekta_. 31. otsal D P. 240. "A former village site," now destroyed. "The present Indians know nothing about a town here." 32. woxkero C See no. 34. 33. woxtek C See no. 34. 34. qootep C P. 240. There is no question concerning the aboriginal existence of these towns. Confusion among modern informants has been due to population shifts caused by the flood of 1862, which damaged _qootep_. 35. pekwan C P. 243. An "important place." 36. yoxtr C P. 244. No question. 37. sregon C P. 244. Waterman says: "Everyone agrees that it has not been there very long." Some informants said it was settled by people from _woxtek_ or _pekwan_. But Waterman says: "... it may have been built before either of the other places." The town is on Randall's map and is mentioned in the 1852 census. Moreover Kroeber says (p. 10) that it "... enjoyed a reputation for belligerence and wealth." Its existence can therefore not be doubted.