The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school product — John Shaqi
The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school productFranzen, Raymond
Science
The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school product
Franzen, Raymond
Ability -- Testing; Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements
4. Whether individual differences in ambition, interest, and industry, in
so far as they influence accomplishment, are due to special tendencies,
or whether they are learned manifestations of a more general heritage.
5. How these proclivities, specific or general, are related to
intelligence.
Points 1 and 2 are problems of procedure which must be evolved from our
existent knowledge of measurements and statistics. Points 3, 4, and
5 are problems which must be solved from the evidence resulting from
an experiment in classification using these methods. Points 4 and 5
introduce the vexed question of whether there is a “general factor” or
some general inherited cause of disparity in school product other than
intelligence. Should reading ability prove to be the result of certain
inherited abilities, or predisposition to abilities, we could not use
a measure of mental ability alone as the guide to what a child could
attain in reading. If intelligence, however, were the only inherited
prognostic factor of school achievement, we could mark the education
which had functioned in the child’s life by the percentage which the
actual accomplishment of the child was of the maximum accomplishment
of which he was capable at that stage of his mental development. So,
too, if interest in particular subjects and ambition are not mainly the
result of rewards and punishments of early life, but are themselves
significantly rooted in the nature of the child, we could not condemn
or commend curricula and methods upon a basis of the ratio of resultant
accomplishment to mental ability, but must include a measure of this
potentiality. The practical queries whether or not a child can do reading
as well as he does arithmetic, whether his ambition and his honesty have
their origin in the same strength or weakness, can be answered only when
these problems are fully solved. The immediate consequences of knowing
that a child can usually be taught to read if he does other tasks well
is of obvious import. It would be of great service, too, to know whether
lack of application can be corrected so as to bring concentration to the
level of the other traits. If a child is normal in other ways and not in
his tendency to respond to the approval of others by satisfaction, can
this “drive” be increased or reduced to the average, or are individual
differences in specific original tendencies basic to development of
character, and if they are, how much influence do these differences
exert upon school accomplishment? In order to classify children and
comprehendingly watch and control their progress we must know the
relation of achievement to the inherited bases upon which it depends. We
must be able to state a child’s progress in any one school subject in
terms of the potential capacity of the child to progress. We must know
the inherited determinants of disparity in school product.
PART II
STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF THE EXPERIMENT
In the discussion and tables which follow:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account