The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school productFranzen, Raymond
Science
The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school product
Franzen, Raymond
Ability -- Testing; Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements
We can the more readily see the significance of viewing a child’s
equipment in terms of educational and mental age, when we conceive of
a Subject Quotient. This is a quotient resulting from the division of
the age level reached in the test in question by the chronological age
of the pupil. It is a measure of the rate of progress of the child in
the school subject under consideration. Thus a ten-year-old child with
ten-year-old ability in Thorndike Reading Scale Alpha 2 would have as
his reading age divided by chronological age, 1.00. This may be called
his Subject Quotient in Reading or his Reading Quotient. The division of
what is by what would be if the child were normal gives the percentage
of normality, the actual rate of progress. Since the IQ is the potential
rate of progress and the SQ the actual rate of progress, the ratio of
SQ to IQ gives the percentage of what that child could do, that he has
actually done. Thus a child with an IQ of 1.32 whose reading quotient
(his RQ) is 1.10, though he is doing work which is above normal, is not
doing work which is above normal for him. His RQ⁄IQ is 1.10⁄1.32, whereas
if he were progressing at his optimum rate it would equal 1.32⁄1.32. This
RQ⁄IQ is the same quantity as RA⁄MA. We may call this a Subject Ratio and
the average of Subject Ratios an Accomplishment Ratio. We could, if the
absolute association between reading age and mental age were perfect,
measure the approximation to ideal educational performance of any one
child in any one elementary school subject through the approximation
of this Subject Ratio to 1.00. As we will see later, Subject Quotients
approach the Intelligence Quotients when special treatment is given; that
is, the correlation of SQ and IQ becomes nearer 1.00 and the difference
between the average IQ and the average SQ approaches zero. It is safe
then to expect these Subject Ratios to be at least 1.00 before we
pronounce satisfaction with the school product.
There is certainly a significant relation between IQ and SQ, and the
more perfect the educational procedure has been, the more it has called
forth all that the child is capable of, the higher it will be. To
determine whether the quotient in any school subject can be greater than
the Intelligence Quotient in any significant amount, it will only be
necessary after we have perfect age norms by months to get that quotient
amongst enough pupils whom we know to be working at maximum. What is
significant here is that the more nearly any such quotient reaches or
exceeds the Intelligence Quotient the more nearly has the child been
brought up to what he is able to do under the best conditions. The
Accomplishment Ratio is the degree to which his actual progress has
attained to his potential progress by the best possible measures of both.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account