M. Magendie introduced some Woorara poison into the limb of a dog, which was only connected with the trunk by means of quills uniting the divided ends of the main vessels. It rapidly took effect. Having divided all the nerves and lymphatics in the intestine of another dog, he introduced into it some Nux Vomica, beyond the division. It quickly acted, and must again have done so through the vessels. Sir B. Brodie cut all the nerves of the anterior extremity of a rabbit, near the axilla, and then introduced Woorara into the foot. It rapidly acted.[18] Thus we see that vascular connexion is sufficient, and that nervous connexion is not necessary. By other similar trials it is found that vascular connexion is absolutely necessary, for when it is interrupted, the action cannot be propagated along a nerve. If, on introducing poison into an extremity, a cord be tightened round the limb above it so as to intercept the flow of blood, no effect is produced. It takes effect after the ligature is relaxed. Sir B. Brodie introduced Woorara into the leg of a dog, which was connected with the trunk only by means of the principal nerve, carefully dissected out. No effect followed. M. Ehbert found that poison would not act when applied to an amputated limb connected with the trunk by a nerve only. Thus vascular connexion is necessary; whereas continuity of nerve is not necessary, neither is it sufficient by itself.[19] Woorara poison is a substance which acts with great rapidity on the nervous system; and if its action cannot be propagated by means of the nerves, _à fortiori_ would it seem that slower poisons must act through the circulation. But, granting that it has been shown that introduction into the stomach is not necessary for the action of a medicine, and that when in the stomach medicines do not act by influencing the nerves, still it may be objected that the rule cannot possibly be universal. It may be urged that some poisons and medicines, as Hydrocyanic acid and Ammonia, act with such great rapidity, that we can only suppose their influence to be transmitted directly along a nerve-fibre to the nervous centre, because the process of passage in the blood to this distant part would be far too slow. This argument requires us to prove a third thing. _The circulation of the blood is sufficiently quick to account even for the operation of those poisons which act most rapidly by influencing the nerve-centres._ There is no poison whatever which acts so quickly on distant parts that the circulation cannot previously have had time to conduct it to them. By means of an instrument invented by M. Poisseuille, Dr. Blake found that a chemical substance traversed the whole circulation of a dog in nine seconds, and of a horse in twenty seconds.[20] The results of Hering were similar. M. Volkmann, in the tenth chapter of his work on Hæmadynamics, states, as the result of several experiments, that the whole circulation in an adult man occupies exactly 65.76 seconds.