The Adductor Muscles of the Jaw In Some Primitive Reptiles — John Shaqi
The Adductor Muscles of the Jaw In Some Primitive ReptilesFox, Richard C.
Science
The Adductor Muscles of the Jaw In Some Primitive Reptiles
Fox, Richard C.
Jaws; Reptiles, Fossil
In _Captorhinus_ the presence of an overlapping premaxillary beak
bearing teeth that are slanted posteriorly requires that the mandible
be drawn back in order to be depressed. Conversely, during closure, the
jaw must be pulled forward to complete full adduction. The
quadrate-articular joint is flat enough to permit such anteroposterior
sliding movements. The relationship of the origin and insertion of the
anterior pterygoid indicates that this muscle, ineffective in
maintaining adduction, may well have acted to pull the mandible
forward, in back of the premaxillary beak, in the last stages of
adduction. Abrasion of the sides of the inner maxillary and outer
dentary teeth indicates that tooth-to-tooth contact did occur. Whether
such abrasion was due to contact in simple vertical adduction or in
anteroposterior sliding is impossible to determine, but the evidence
considered above indicates the latter probability.
Similarities of _Protorothyris_ to sphenacodont pelycosaurs in the
shape of the skull and palate already commented upon by Watson (1954)
and Hotton (1961) suggest that the condition of the adductors in
_Dimetrodon_ is a retention of the primitive reptilian pattern, with
modifications mainly limited to an increase in size of the temporalis.
_Captorhinus_, however, seems to have departed rather radically from
the primitive pattern, developing specializations of the adductors that
are correlated with the flattening of the skull, the peculiar marginal
and anterior dentition, the modifications of the quadrate-articular
joint, and the development of the coronoid process.
Thrinaxodon
The evidence for the position and extent of the external adductors of
the lower jaw in _Thrinaxodon_ was secured in part from dissections of
_Didelphis marsupialis_, the Virginia opossum. Moreover, comparison of
the two genera reveals striking similarities in the shape and spatial
relationships of the external adductors. These are compared below in
some detail.
The sagittal crest in _Thrinaxodon_ is present but low. It arises
immediately in front of the pineal foramen from the confluence of
bilateral ridges that extend posteriorly and medially from the base of
the postorbital bars. The crest diverges around the foramen, reunites
immediately behind it, and continues posteriorly to its junction with
the supraoccipital crest (Estes, 1961).
In _Didelphis_ the sagittal crest is high and dorsally convex in
lateral aspect, arising posterior to and medial to the orbits, reaching
its greatest height near the midpoint, and sloping down to its
termination at the supraoccipital crest. Two low ridges extend
posteriorly from the postorbital process to the anterior end of the
sagittal crest and correspond to ridges in similar position in
_Thrinaxodon_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account