The Adventurous Simplicissimus: being the description of the Life of a Strange vagabond named Melchior Sternfels von FuchshaimGrimmelshausen, Hans Jakob Christoph von
General
The Adventurous Simplicissimus: being the description of the Life of a Strange vagabond named Melchior Sternfels von Fuchshaim
Grimmelshausen, Hans Jakob Christoph von
German fiction -- Translations into English; Thirty Years' War, 1618-1648 -- Fiction
"Oho!" answered the secretary, "if the matter is to be settled by our
reviling of each other, then can I cast in thy teeth thy father was but
a clownish peasant of the Spessart, and though in thy home and in thy
family there be many famous blockheads, yet thou hast made thyself yet
lower, seeing that thou art become an unreasoning calf."
So I answered: "Thou art right; 'tis even that that that I would
maintain; namely, that the virtues of the parents descend not always to
the children, and that therefore the children be not always worthy of
their parent's titles of honour. For me it is no shame to have become a
calf, seeing that in such case I have the honour to follow the great
king Nebuchadnezzar. Who knoweth whether it may not please God that I,
like him, may again become a man, yea, and a far greater one than my
dad? Yet do I praise those only that by their own virtues do make
themselves nobles."
"Let it be so for the sake of argument," said the secretary, "that the
children should not always inherit the titles of their parents, yet
thou must acknowledge that they are worthy of all praise which do earn
their nobility by a good conduct: and if that be so, it followeth that
we do rightly honour the children for the parents' sake, since the
apple falleth not far from the tree. And who would not honour in the
descendants of Alexander the Great, if such there were to hand, their
ancient forefather's high courage in the wars. For this man shewed in
his youth his desire for fighting, in that he wept (though not yet able
to bear arms) grieving lest his father might conquer all and leave him
nothing to subdue. Did not he before the thirtieth year of his age
overcome all the world and wish for another to conquer? Did not he in a
battle against the Indians, when he was deserted by his men, for sheer
rage sweat blood? And was he not so terrible to look upon (as though he
were all begirt with flames of fire) that even the savages must flee
before him in battle? Who would not esteem him higher and nobler than
other men, of whom Quintus Curtius tells that his breath was like
perfume and his sweat like musk and that his dead body smelt of
precious spiceries? Here could I cite the case of Julius Cæsar and
Pompeius, of whom the one, besides the victories which he won in the
civil wars, did fifty times engage in pitched battles, and defeated and
slew 1,520,000 men: while the other, besides the taking of 940 ships
from the pirates, did from the Alps to the uttermost parts of Spain
capture and subdue 376 cities and towns. Lucius Siccius, the Roman
people's tribune, was engaged in 120 pitched battles, and did eight
times conquer them that challenged him: he could shew forty-five scars
on his body, and those all in front and none behind: with nine
generals-in-chief did he enter Rome in their triumphs, which they did
clearly earn by their courage. Yea, and Manlius Capitolinus's honour in
war were no less had he not at the end of his life himself abased his
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account