The rapidity with which an aeroplane onslaught can be made should,
indeed, prove one of the most important features of aerial warfare.
Destructive machines may fly from their Headquarters, deliver an attack
fifty or a hundred miles away, and—their ammunition exhausted—return
quickly to their base for more, and so be ready to renew the attack.
II. Effect of aerial bombardment upon cities and troops—German tests.
It was after a seven years’ study of military aviation, as Commandant of
the British Government Balloon School, that Colonel J. E. Capper
declared emphatically: "The necessity has arisen for every warlike
nation to have a sufficient aerial fleet, armed and equipped for
offensive warfare."
His advice, however, was not adopted—at any rate, not by the War Office.
No steps have yet been taken to estimate the value of an aeroplane as a
destructive instrument, despite the fact that France and Germany are
keenly alive to the possibilities of a large number of weight-carrying
machines.
In Germany, at the present time, secret tests and experiments are being
made, and the construction of special machines undertaken. Meanwhile, we
fumble along. If a war broke out to-morrow, it is true that destructive
work by aeroplanes, on anything like a large scale, would not be
undertaken.
But what about the day after to-morrow—or rather next year? Every day,
the general efficiency of the aeroplane is being improved, and its
radius of action increased. Practically every day, also, foreign nations
are adding to their air-fleets. Already the art of employing aircraft in
fairly large numbers has been learned. Machines for destructive work can
now be built—and are being built; and yet we are content, as yet, to do
nothing.
Sufficient warning has been given. Colonel Templer, an officer
identified with the first Government aeronautical work undertaken in
England, has declared: "It is conclusively proved that the aeroplane is
a machine for carrying out attacks in warfare. We must, therefore, be
prepared not only for defence against bomb-dropping aeroplanes; we must
be prepared, if necessary, to use them."
Another military expert of high repute, speaking of the havoc that a
hostile air-fleet might work, by an attack upon the Thames Valley
between Hammersmith and Gravesend, has observed: "This whole fifty miles
of concentrated essence of Empire lies at the absolute mercy of an
aerial machine, which could plant a dozen incendiary missiles in certain
pre-selected spots."
The point to be considered, in this connection, is this: such an aerial
attack is no longer a vague possibility. It was only the other day,
while discussing the destructive capabilities of modern-type aeroplanes,
that a famous constructer showed how—if a large fleet of machines was
marshalled together—it would be possible for an enemy to drop a couple
of hundred tons of explosive matter upon London, suddenly appearing from
across the Channel by air, and as flying quickly back again.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account