American naval men were naturally impressed by this performance, and
also by a series of experiments which were carried out by Mr Glen H.
Curtiss, the builder of the biplane which bears his name.
Mr Curtiss designed a biplane which would float upon the water on
pontoons, and also rise from the surface of the water when it moved
forward at a certain speed.
Considerable ingenuity was exercised in the construction of this
machine. The pontoons upon which it was mounted, and which took the
place of ordinary land wheels, were hollow boxes with pointed ends, made
out of wood, and sheathed with thin steel.
A large pontoon, under the centre of the biplane, bore the greater part
of the weight, and a smaller pontoon was set under the front of the
machine; while a third pontoon, smaller still, was placed at the extreme
forward end of the aeroplane, to tilt it upward when it began to move
across the water.
First tests with this machine were entirely successful. When forced
forward by its propeller, at a speed of thirty miles an hour, the
hydro-aeroplane skimmed along with only its main pontoon on the water.
Then, at a slight acceleration, it rose easily into the air, and flew
off. Descents upon the surface of the water were made with equal
facility.
[Illustration: MOTOR TRANSPORT.
Photo, M. Branger.
This picture shows how a Breguet military biplane, with its main-planes
folded by the sides of its body, can be towed from point to point behind
a motor-lorry.]
After satisfying himself that his machine answered expectations, Curtiss
carried out an instructive test in conjunction with an American
battleship. Flying from a point on shore, he made a successful descent
upon the water close beside the vessel. Then his machine was hoisted on
board, by means of special tackle.
To complete the test, the biplane was subsequently lowered into the
water again; and Curtiss rose without difficulty, flying back to the
shore.
The objection to such a scheme as this, of course, would lie in the
probable roughness of the sea under many conditions of work. Were a high
sea running, it is generally admitted that an aeroplane could not
possibly rise from, or land upon, the surface of the water. Therefore,
the sound plan, at any rate on the high seas, would seem to be for an
air-scout to be launched from the deck of a ship.
An aeroplane on pontoons should, however, find many uses for coastal
work. It could, for example, be housed in a shed on the water. It could
then leave harbour on a reconnoitring flight, and return again, when
alighting, to the smooth water inside the harbour. An involuntary
descent, when over the water, would not cause it injury.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account