"In a year, in regard to these two machines, the tables have been
turned," added Mr du Cros. "Now the aeroplane, which costs so much less
than the dirigible, is infinitely its superior. One aeroplane, costing
say £1000, would, in the case of actual aerial warfare, have completely
at its mercy a dirigible balloon costing perhaps £50,000."
Defending their policy, soon after Mr du Cros’ attacks, and responding
to the definite statement that "aeroplanes have become immeasurably
superior to airships for military purposes," War Office experts advanced
the argument: "There would be work in war-time, such as very detailed
reconnaissance, that an airship could perform better than an aeroplane.
Both types should, therefore, be developed."
It may be agreed, in this connection, that the airship would, in a
number of cases, allow of a more detailed reconnaissance being made than
from an aeroplane; its slower speed, and the fact that it could hover
over one spot, would give it this advantage. But, to set against this,
there is one very obvious disadvantage. The size of the airship, and the
fact that it is moving slowly, makes it an admirable target for
artillery. In actual warfare, it would, without doubt, very soon be hit.
In this connection, too, the fact must be remembered that, whereas a
wrecked aeroplane would represent a comparatively small financial loss,
the destruction of a dirigible would be as great a calamity as the loss
of a whole aeroplane fleet.
The expenses entailed in organising a dirigible balloon fleet are
enormous, and altogether out of proportion to the useful work which
these vessels could accomplish in time of war.
If an airship service is to be of practical value, monster sheds must be
erected all over the country, so that a vessel may be able to run to one
or other of them for shelter, when caught in a high wind. Apart from the
expenditure which these sheds entail, the need arises to spend other
large amounts upon the crews of trained men necessary to handle the
aircraft when they leave the ground, or return from a flight.
There is another formidable item—the cost of the hydrogen gas necessary
to inflate the huge envelopes; and, added to this, there is constant
expenditure in effecting repairs, caused by the trifling accidents which
are always occurring in handling these aerial monsters. Thus, a ruinous
bill of cost is quickly arrived at.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account