The Afghan Wars 1839-42 and 1878-80Forbes, Archibald
History
The Afghan Wars 1839-42 and 1878-80
Forbes, Archibald
Afghan Wars
Futteh Ali, the old Shah of Persia, died in 1834, and was succeeded by
his grandson Prince Mahomed Meerza, a young man who inherited much of
the ambition of his gallant father Abbas Meerza. His especial
aspiration, industriously stimulated by his Russian advisers, urged him
to the enterprise of conquering the independent principality of Herat,
on the western border of Afghanistan. Herat was the only remnant of
Afghan territory that still remained to a member of the legitimate royal
house. Its ruler was Shah Kamran, son of that Mahmoud Shah who, after
ousting his brother Shah Soojah from the throne of Cabul, had himself
been driven from that elevation, and had retired to the minor
principality of Herat. The young Shah of Persia was not destitute of
justification for his designs on Herat. That this was so was frankly
admitted by Mr Ellis, the British envoy to his Court, who wrote to his
Government that the Shah had fair claim to the sovereignty of
Afghanistan as far as Ghuznee, and that Kamran's conduct in occupying
part of the Persian province of Seistan had given the Shah 'a full
justification for commencing hostilities against Herat.'
The serious phase of the situation for England and India was that
Russian influence was behind Persia in this hostile action against
Herat. Mr Ellis pointed out that in the then existing state of relations
between Persia and Russia, the progress of the former in Afghanistan was
tantamount to the advancement of the latter. But unfortunately there
remained valid an article in the treaty of 1814 to the effect that, in
case of war between the Afghans and the Persians, the English Government
should not interfere with either party unless when called on by both to
mediate. In vain did Ellis and his successor M'Neill remonstrate with
the Persian monarch against the Herat expedition. An appeal to St
Petersburg, on the part of Great Britain, produced merely an evasive
reply. How diplomatic disquietude had become intensified may be inferred
from this, that whereas in April 1836 Ellis wrote of Persia as a Russian
first parallel of attack against India, Lord Auckland, then
Governor-General of India, directed M'Neill, in the early part of 1837,
to urge the Shah to abandon his enterprise, on the ground that he (the
Governor-General) 'must view with umbrage and displeasure schemes of
interference and conquest on our western frontier.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account