The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South AfricaHooker, Le Roy
History
The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South Africa
Hooker, Le Roy
Afrikaners; South Africa -- Politics and government; Transvaal (South Africa) -- History
Three days later the same officers published an address to the
inhabitants, in Dutch and German, renewing the offer of protection
under the conditions laid before the council by General Craig, and
inviting them to send a committee of their own selection to Simonstown
to confer with the heads of the British expedition. The address
emphasized the alternative before the people—a French or an English
occupation. The former, it affirmed, would introduce a government on
Jacobin principles, and would result in anarchy, the guillotine, an
insurrection of the slaves with all the horrors that had been enacted
at St. Domingo and Guadeloupe, isolation from Europe, the destruction
of commerce and a dearth of money and of the necessaries of life. But
the English occupation, it went on to say, would give them safety under
the wing of the only power in Europe that was able to assure protection
of person and property under the existing laws, or any others the
colonists might choose to enact; it would secure a free market for all
their products at the best prices; it would release their trade from
the heavy imposts of the Dutch East India Company; it would open and
promote commerce by sea and land between all parts of the colony, and
it would secure better pay for such of the colonial troops as might
choose to enter the British military service.
This appeal directly to the people over the heads of their chief
officials, and to the cupidity of their mercenary soldiers, was
resented by the council, who notified the British representatives
forthwith that further communication on the subject of British
occupancy was not desired.
Nevertheless, on the 26th of June, the admiral and the general sent the
colonial authorities another long letter, reiterating therein their
former statements to the effect that the Netherlands had been absorbed
by France; that if left to itself the Cape colony would be absorbed in
like manner, and adding the significant intimation that his Britannic
Majesty could not allow it to fall into the hands of his enemies.
The council responded to this letter by prohibiting any further supply
of provisions to the British force, and strengthening the post at
Muizenburg with Burgher horsemen, pandours and the entire garrison from
Boetselaar except one man; he was left to spike the guns in case the
English should land. The council also wrote the British commanders that
they noted the difference between proffered assistance against an
invader and a demand to surrender the colony to the British government.
When the real design of the English was revealed, the disaffected
Burghers of the Cape and of Stellenbosch ceased all opposition to the
government, and offered to do their utmost in defense of the colony.
When the Commissioner announced that the country would not be
surrendered to the English, the people cheered him rapturously in the
streets, and saluted him as Father Sluysken.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account