The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South Africa — John Shaqi
The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South AfricaHooker, Le Roy
History
The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South Africa
Hooker, Le Roy
Afrikaners; South Africa -- Politics and government; Transvaal (South Africa) -- History
When the call to assemble at the Cape was signaled to the country
Burghers, only seventy men from the Swellendam district responded. The
nationals, who had been in revolt against the Dutch East India
Company’s government, declined to obey. Further appeals by letter
failed to bring any more of them in. At last, on the 7th of July, in a
written communication, it was proposed by the nationals that they would
rally to the defense of the country if the government would grant them
amnesty for the past and pledge a reasonable redress of their
grievances as soon as possible. Among the principal stipulations were
these: The nationalists were to be exempted from direct taxation and to
have free trade; the cartoon money—a depreciated currency—was to be
withdrawn from circulation, and they were to be granted permission to
hold in perpetual slavery all Bushmen captured by commandos or
individuals.
The nationals had no sooner dispatched the letter containing their
overture than it occurred to some of them that their claims would
surely be ignored if the British obtained control of the colony.
Therefore, without waiting for a response from the government, they
resolved to aid in the defense of the country, and at the same time
continue to assert their right to self-government. In accordance
therewith a company of one hundred and sixty-eight mounted men was
organized under Commandant Delpont and at once set out for Cape Town.
The rally from the country districts of Swellendam, Stellenbosch and
Drakenstein brought together a force of eleven hundred and forty
horsemen. Two hundred of these were added to the post at Muizenburg.
The rest were stationed at Cape Town and along the road to the camp as
pickets.
Hostile operations came on very slowly. Admiral Elphinstone seized
three more Dutch merchant ships that were lying in Simon’s Bay on the
9th of July. On the 14th he landed four hundred and fifty soldiers, who
occupied Simonstown, and strengthened the post a week later by adding
four hundred marines.
Strangely enough, neither the English commanders nor Commissioner
Sluysken chose to regard these movements as acts of war. The
Commissioner had been careful to order that no attack should be made on
the English, and that nothing whatever should be done that would
provoke retaliation or furnish grounds for them to throw the blame of
opening hostilities on the Dutch. It was not until the 3d of August
that any act was committed which was by either party construed into an
act of war. On that day a Burgher officer fired at an English picket
and wounded one of the men. For this he was reprimanded by the
Commissioner. General Craig reported it in his dispatches as the
beginning of hostilities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account