The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South Africa — John Shaqi
The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South AfricaHooker, Le Roy
History
The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South Africa
Hooker, Le Roy
Afrikaners; South Africa -- Politics and government; Transvaal (South Africa) -- History
It soon became evident, however, that the proceedings of the new
settlers in Natal were narrowly watched by the authorities at the Cape,
and that some of the measures taken were looked upon with serious
displeasure. The expulsion of the Kaffirs, and an attempt to force them
into a territory already occupied by another tribe, were condemned as
being likely to provoke further disorder and conflict. And then, the
Cape government, since the Great Trek, had asserted over and over again
its right to control the Africanders in any region they might occupy,
as subjects of the British crown. Their action in establishing a new
and independent white state on the coast was viewed with alarm; for it
would certainly affect trade with the interior tribes, and it might
create a local rival to Britain’s maritime supremacy within what had
been considered her own borders. Besides, the colonial government held
that it was the natural guardian and protector of the natives, and the
attack of the Africanders on the Kaffirs living in near neighborhood to
the eastern borders of the Cape settlements was regarded as an insolent
aggression which ought to be resented and checked.
The Africanders, on the other hand, denied that the Cape government had
any authority over them. The British government, they averred, was
territorial and had no authority outside the region hitherto formally
claimed by the British crown. And they had trekked out of the territory
to which Great Britain had laid claim purposely to be a separate, free
and independent people. England’s thirty million dollars had purchased
such territorial rights and public improvements in South Africa as were
formerly possessed by the Netherlands, but her money had not bought
people.
At this time the British government was unwilling to add to its already
too extensive colonial possessions and the heavy responsibilities
connected with them. Nevertheless, after careful consideration of all
that would be involved in not checking the Africander aspirations and
movements towards independence, it was determined to establish British
dominion over Port Natal and the territory west of it as far as the
crest of the Quathlamba chain of mountains and the extension of them to
the north. Pursuant to this policy a small military force under Captain
Smith was sent to take possession of Port Natal in 1842.
Smith’s command was selected from the post garrison at Umgazi River,
and consisted of only two hundred men and two field pieces. The route
was over nearly three hundred miles of sea coast in a wilderness state,
across numerous rivers, and through the habitat of elephants and lions
whose fresh spoor the men saw frequently. After an arduous march of
thirty-five days, from the 31st of March to the 4th of May, they
reached Port Natal and camped on a hill about six miles from the town.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account