The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South AfricaHooker, Le Roy
History
The Africanders : $b A century of Dutch-English feud in South Africa
Hooker, Le Roy
Afrikaners; South Africa -- Politics and government; Transvaal (South Africa) -- History
It is not necessary to trace, step by step, the diplomatic
correspondence on the subject of reforms in the Transvaal during 1897,
1898 and the first two months of 1899. The whole situation—including
every subject in dispute between the two governments—will come into
view in the discussions and negotiations immediately preceding the
outbreak of the Africanders’ Second War of Independence, in October,
1899.
On the 20th of March, 1899, in reply to a question by Sir E. Ashmead
Bartlett as to Great Britain’s right to interfere with the affairs of
the South African Republic, Mr. Chamberlain, from his place in
parliament, said:
“There are certain cases where we can intervene, and rightly intervene,
in Transvaal affairs.
“1. In the first place, we may intervene if there is any breach of the
convention.
“2. There is no doubt we should have the usual right of interference if
* * * the treatment of British subjects in the Transvaal was of such
nature as would give us the right to interfere as to the treatment of
British subjects in France or Germany.
“3. Then there is only one other case—the third case. We can make
friendly recommendations to the Transvaal for the benefit of South
Africa generally and in the interests of peace.”
In concluding Mr. Chamberlain said: “I do not feel at the moment that
any case has arisen which would justify me in taking the strong action
suggested”; the reference being to the sending of an ultimatum.
The next important development was a petition to the Imperial
Government, signed by 21,684 British subjects in the Transvaal, praying
for interference in their behalf. This was forwarded through Mr.
Conyngham Greene, the British agent at Pretoria, to Sir Alfred Milner,
Governor of Cape Colony, who transmitted it to London, where it was
received by Mr. Chamberlain on the 14th of April.
Summarized, the complaints of the petitioners were as follows:
1. The great majority of the uitlander population consists of British
subjects who have no share in the government.
2. Petitions of the uitlanders to the Transvaal government have either
failed or have been scornfully rejected.
3. Instead of redressing uitlander grievances, the Transvaal
government, after the Jameson raid, passed laws making their position
more irksome—i.e., the immigration of aliens act, the press law, the
aliens expulsion law. The immigration act was suspended at the
insistence of the British government, but the others remain in force.
4. The Transvaal government exercises the power of suppressing
publications devoted to the interests of British uitlanders.
5. British subjects are expelled from the Transvaal without the right
of appeal to the high court.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account