Alfred, King of England, 849-899; Enamel and enameling; Great Britain -- History -- Alfred, 871-899
[41] ‘Domino gloriosissimo occidentalis regni sceptra gubernanti,
quem ego, ut mihi scrutator cordis et rerum testis est, fraterna
caritate amplector, Gerontio Regi simulque cunctis Dei sacerdotibus
per Domnoniam conversantibus, Althelmus, &c.’ Haddan and Stubbs,
_Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents relating to Great Britain
and Ireland_, vol. iii, p. 268.
[42] In the edition by F. Wise (1722) it is on p. 48; in _Monumenta
Historica Britannica_, p. 486.
[43] This letter is printed in the edition of Asser by F. Wise,
p. 123; and the most important parts are given in English by Mr.
Conybeare, _Alfred in the Chroniclers_, p. 218.
[44] And þæs on Eastron worhte Ælfred cyning, litle werede, geweorc
æt Æþelinga eigge, and of þam geweorce was winnende wiþ þone here,
and Sumursætna se dæl se þær niehst wæs. _Sax. Chron._, Ā. 878.
[45] _Forty-one Years in India_, chap. xlvi.
CHAPTER IX
NEWTON PARK AND FAIRFIELD HOUSE
From the date of its discovery in 1693 down to the present time, the
name of ‘Newton Park’ has been associated with the Alfred Jewel as
designating the property on which it was found. In our day, however,
this name is no longer recognized in the neighbourhood, and indeed it
is apt to be misleading. For this title is now current in Somerset in
another sense, namely, as denoting the seat of Earl Temple at Newton
St. Loe, near Bath. Still the honorific appellation of ‘Newton Park,’
for the estate on which the Jewel was discovered, will be found to
rest upon historic antecedents, which are full of interest, and not
devoid of suggestiveness for the purpose of our present investigation.
The extant mention of this Newton carries us back a good space behind
the Norman Conquest. The Will of Ælfric, archbishop of Canterbury, who
died in 1006, affords evidence that he was a landowner in Newton. It
is not generally possible to identify a place by a name which became
so common, but the coupling of it in Abp. Ælfric’s Will with the name
of Fiddington, removes all uncertainty. The passage in the Will (which
is cast in the third person) runs thus: ‘And the land in the West
Country at Fiddington and at Newton he bequeathed to his sisters and
their children[46].’
In the forest laws, which grew up after the Conquest, we find that the
custody of the royal forest of North Petherton was a serjeanty, which
was attached to the Manor of Newton and caused it to be distinguished
by the name of Newton Forester. When this Manor was granted by King
John to William de Wrotham, it was declared that he held it by the
service of being the king’s forester in the counties of Somerset,
Dorset, Devon, and Cornwall. As he does not appear to have exercised
his office beyond the county of Somerset, this territorial definition
suggests that some vague prerogative had attached to Newton Manor at
an earlier time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account