There is yet another effort made to drag Ulpian into this same chapter,
namely, when Lampridius says that part of Antonine’s scheme for the
murder of Alexander was to deprive him of his tutors, one of whom he
banished (Ulpian), while Silvinus, the distinguished orator, whom the
Emperor himself had recommended, was put to death. Both of these men
suffered because they were great and good men. Now, Ulpian we know,
Julius Paulus we know also (though quite why he was left by Alexander’s
side when good men were banished we are not told; unless it be that, for
the moment, he was hiding his light under a bushel); but who on earth
was Silvinus? His name is not given amongst that exhaustive list of
nonentities marshalled out by Lampridius (_Alex. Sev. vita_, xxxii.) as
the men who had failed to teach Alexander Latin, after an effort which
lasted from his earliest babyhood up to the time of his death; neither
is he mentioned in any other place, either by this author or in any
other record of Antonine’s cruelties; on which account we feel inclined
to relegate him, with other doubtful blessings, to the special limbo
reserved for all similarly inspired terminological inexactitudes, and
proceed to recount the rapidity with which Mamaea found means to make up
for lost time in acquiring her authority.
Needless to say, even here Lampridius’ fabrications are as difficult
to reconcile with Dion and Herodian’s stories as those two authors are
impossible to square with one another. Of course the two last were both
eye-witnesses of the scenes they recount, and tell us so, with some
pride, a circumstance which in no way hinders them from seeing things
double, and calling them different aspects of the same truth, after the
manner of theologians when they are in a conciliatory frame of mind.
For the murder of Antonine Lampridius assigns no adequate reason, giving
instead two suppositions of his own—first, that the Praetorians feared
Antonine’s vengeance on account of the attack which they had made on him
some months previously, and for which he had then and there forgiven
them; but, says Lampridius, despite this forgiveness, the soldiers
killed him in cold blood. Second, that on account of the hatred he had
testified towards them (presumably in not seeing to their donatives),
they resolved to rid the Republic of this pest, and began by putting to
death, first, the friends of the Emperor by various foul and indecent
means, and then, having got these out of the way, they openly attacked
Antonine in the latrinae, and killed him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account