Such was the position of matrimony when, early in July 219, the Emperor
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus took to wife the Lady Julia Cornelia Paula,
of the well-known though by no means patrician family of Cornelia. Her
father was Julius Paulus, probably one of the most famous jurisconsults
and lawyers Rome has ever known. As father-in-law to an Emperor, his
position was doubtless, like that of Sylla, the father-in-law of
Caesar, somewhat heady. Unfortunately it impaired his usefulness to a
considerable degree. We learn from the editors of the _Prosopographia_
that there are only five decrees on subjects of jurisprudence which can
be definitely assigned to this reign, and from Lampridius that Paulus
was appointed to the presumably lucrative, though certainly uninspiring
office of usher to the young Alexander, on whose bovine intelligence he
could unfortunately make no impression. It is doubtless wrong to promote
relations to Court sinecures when they can be better and more usefully
employed in arduous work for the state, but it is a position to which
even the best of us aspire when fatigued with either a misspent or a
full-spent life.
According to Barrachinus, the family of Cornelia came from Padua;
Bertrand says they were from Tyro; and in Pignorius’ estimation they may
even have seen light in Rome. Julius and his daughter are the only two of
the family who have come into prominence. Unfortunately, we do not know
the date of the birth or death of either, nor the year in which Julius
began to climb; suffice it to say, that he had published many volumes
before the death of Septimius Severus, in whose council, according to
Digest xxix., he had a place. His first office seems to have been that
of Praetor, and thence by regular stages he climbed to that of Praefect
of Rome, finishing with the height of all ambition, the Praefecture of
the Praetorium, and as such he was a Senator of the Empire. Tristran—who
knew about as much of the lady personally as you or I can—has remarked
that Julia was beautiful. His taste is certainly not a modern one, as
her effigy represents her with a sharp beaky face, and a long scraggy
neck. This author, with some show of fairness, attempts to justify his
statement by a truism, namely, that the Emperor was such a connoisseur of
beauty that he would never have chosen a lady who had not this necessary
qualification. Precisely, but did Antonine choose the lady at all? The
probabilities are that she was well over thirty at the time of the
marriage, and that the Emperor had neither seen nor heard of her before
she was presented to him by his relations, on his arrival in Rome; in
fact, that this marriage was a political move by means of which the
official classes were closely allied with the imperial house.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account