The American Agriculturist. Vol. II. No. XI, December 1843: Designed to Improve the Planter, the Farmer, the Stock-breeder, and the Horticulturist — John Shaqi
The American Agriculturist. Vol. II. No. XI, December 1843: Designed to Improve the Planter, the Farmer, the Stock-breeder, and the HorticulturistVarious
Science
The American Agriculturist. Vol. II. No. XI, December 1843: Designed to Improve the Planter, the Farmer, the Stock-breeder, and the Horticulturist
Various
Agriculture -- Periodicals; Agriculture -- United States -- Periodicals
For feed we prefer corn mostly; a little wheat, rye, or barley, is
also very well as a change; oats have rather too much husk about
them. In addition to these, boiled potatoes, sweet apples, pumpkins,
and sugar beet, are excellent food, especially when mixed with a due
proportion of mush or hasty pudding. Where sweet potatoes abound, they
are an excellent substitute for the last. To the above, add daily a
little lean meat, that which is cooked is preferred; and the last
week of their fattening, for a finishing process, rice boiled in milk
and sweetened with molasses, is very excellent. This may be called an
expensive method; but our readers may be assured that the fowls will be
enough better to pay for it. Meat derives much of its taste from the
kind and quality of food that the animals consume; hence gross, fatty
substances, fish, or anything that is disagreeable to the taste should
be avoided in the food given to fowls during the fattening process,
as these invariably impart more or less of their disagreeable flavor
to the flesh of the poultry fed upon them. It is well known that the
celebrated canvass-back duck derives its delicacy of taste from feeding
on the bulbous roots of a peculiar grass growing in the Chesapeake
bay, and that other kinds of ducks are scarcely eatable, in consequence
of their living almost entirely upon fish. These remarks will hold good
to most kinds of birds, both of the water and land, and, indeed, of
all animals; accordingly as their food is good or bad, so will be the
quality of the milk, meat, or eggs.
We recollect when a boy, of having occasionally seen geese and ducks
nailed through the webs of their feet to planks and floors, and hens
and turkeys tied up and so closely confined to stakes, that they could
not exercise. This was done so that they might fat the faster! How
shockingly barbarous, and any one guilty of such a practice in these
days, ought to be indicted, and severely punished for their cruelty and
cupidity. We are totally opposed to the close confinement of beast or
bird. Without exercise, the system can not be in a healthy state; and
the meat of close confined animals is never as good, to say the least
of it, as when they have plenty of fresh air, and are allowed to move
moderately about.
The best method of killing fowls, is to cut their heads off at a single
blow with a sharp axe, and then hang them up and allow them to bleed
freely. By this process they never know what hurts them, or endure pain
for a second. Wringing the necks of poultry is almost as shocking as
nailing their feet to planks for the purpose of fattening them, and
follows in the same barbarous category.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account