Humorous stories; Mistaken identity -- Fiction; United States -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
Tracy seemed to be listening to utterances of his own made in talks
with his radical friends in England. It was as if some eavesdropping
phonograph had treasured up his words and brought them across the
Atlantic to accuse him with them in the hour of his defection and
retreat. Every word spoken by this stranger seemed to leave a blister
on Tracy’s conscience, and by the time the speech was finished he felt
that he was all conscience and one blister. This man’s deep compassion
for the enslaved and oppressed millions in Europe who had to bear with
the contempt of that small class above them, throned upon shining
heights whose paths were shut against them, was the very thing he had
often uttered himself. The pity in this man’s voice and words was the
very twin of the pity that used to reside in his own heart and come
from his own lips when he thought of these oppressed peoples.
The homeward tramp was accomplished in brooding silence. It was a
silence most grateful to Tracy’s feelings. He wouldn’t have broken it
for anything; for he was ashamed of himself all the way through to his
spine. He kept saying to himself:
“How unanswerable it all is—how absolutely unanswerable! It is basely,
degradingly selfish to keep those unearned honors, and—and—oh, hang it,
nobody but a cur—”
“What an idiotic damned speech that Tompkins made!”
This outburst was from Barrow. It flooded Tracy’s demoralized soul with
waters of refreshment. These were the darlingest words the poor
vacillating young apostate had ever heard—for they whitewashed his
shame for him, and that is a good service to have when you can’t get
the best of all verdicts, self-acquittal.
“Come up to my room and smoke a pipe, Tracy.”
Tracy had been expecting this invitation, and had had his declination
all ready: but he was glad enough to accept, now. Was it possible that
a reasonable argument could be made against that man’s desolating
speech? He was burning to hear Barrow try it. He knew how to start him,
and keep him going: it was to seem to combat his positions—a process
effective with most people.
“What is it you object to in Tompkins’s speech, Barrow?”
“Oh, the leaving out of the factor of human nature; requiring another
man to do what you wouldn’t do yourself.”
“Do you mean—”
“Why here’s what I mean; it’s very simple. Tompkins is a blacksmith;
has a family; works for wages; and hard, too—fooling around won’t
furnish the bread. Suppose it should turn out that by the death of
somebody in England he is suddenly an earl—income, half a million
dollars a year. What would he do?”
“Well, I—I suppose he would have to decline to—”
“Man, he would grab it in a second!”
“Do you really think he would?”
“Think?—I don’t think anything about it, I know it.”
“Why?”
“Why? Because he’s not a fool.”
“So you think that if he were a fool, he—”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account