The horse Tradition has been taught one trick. He takes the low Toltec
fence like a practised hunter; and his delighted riders put him at it
again and again, never tiring of taking their turn at clearing it on the
back of their noble mount.
"Toltec" has become the password, the shibboleth which admits one to the
freemasonry of Mayan archæology. Without it you are a lost soul, a
heretic fit only for the rack and stake of the archæological
Inquisitors. Among the good people who worry round the Mayan problem,
this Toltec rubbish has become a veritable bogy. We are now going to do
our best to "lay" this spook once and for all.
But first, what is the Toltec theory, to which whosoever will attain
archæological Nirvana must subscribe his "Credo"?
The Toltecs are a people who dropped from the clouds into Mexico at or
about the seventh century of our era, bringing with them building
specifications, and, being mysteriously possessed of a high
civilisation, dotted Mexico and the nearer parts of Central America with
marvellous palaces and temples. Tradition has it that they came to
Mexico (no one bothers to say whence) in 648 and founded the city of
Tula, supposed to be identical (in site at least) with the present town
of that name, about forty miles to the north of Mexico City. They
flourished for many centuries, increasing and spreading over the whole
of Mexico, numbering at the height of their prosperity some four or five
millions. Through famine, pestilences, and wars waged on them by other
nations of the north they gradually diminished and were finally driven
down into Chiapas, Guatemala, and Yucatan. During this enforced
emigration they are supposed to have built the city of Palenque and
those on the Usumacinta in Tabasco; the many buildings found in Western
Guatemala and Southern Yucatan. Finally they reached Chichen Itza,
whence they later migrated down the eastern coast of Yucatan to Copan
and Quirigua in Eastern Guatemala.
A minor controversy has raged around the question of the site of their
cradle city, Tula. Some theorists have held that it was somewhere on the
coast: they generously give you the whole eastern seaboard of Mexico
from which to choose. One of the enthusiastic Tulaites, deeming it well
to hedge, suggests three possible sites, one on the Pacific coast,
another on the Gulf of Mexico, and a third on the Atlantic coast of
Guatemala, south of Honduras. Toltec bogy or not, this egregious
theoriser has at least the satisfaction of knowing that with three sites
so far apart he cannot very well help being on the right coast.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account