The very natural temptation to assign a romantically great age to the
ruins of Central America has proved too much for most writers and
students of the subject. We, too, would like to think that these Mayan
buildings rival in antiquity those of Egypt; but we have been unable to
blind ourselves to certain facts, which are as commonplace as they are
convincing. The proper way to judge the age of a building is not to
stand in front of it in an attitude of reverence like a pre-Raphaelite
before an Old Master, but to look at it with the critical eye of a
mason, if you can. If you are not a mason, or know nothing about
masonry, then you should take an expert with you. If the many students
of Mayan edifices had taken the trouble to put them to this very simple
test, noting how they were built, and then making due allowance for the
friability of the material and so on, we should have heard less of the
fairy tales which have gained undeserved currency in past years.
If the theory which we have put forward in our last chapter is as sound
as we believe it to be, it would seem satisfactorily to fix a maximum
date for Central American buildings. But we cannot too emphatically
point out that our view as to the age of the ruins has not been evolved
to suit our theory as to who were America's first architects, but is
based upon entirely practical tests which are by their nature final.
We have imagined that the architects reached the coast of Central
America at about 13° north latitude. It is probable that they would not
begin to build directly they landed, but would first look for a suitable
site on which they might found a settlement. They possibly numbered two
or three hundred; more than this is most unlikely. In such small numbers
they could not possess themselves of any likely spot irrespective of the
American tribes already inhabiting the country. The chance is that it
was some little while before they finally founded a city. But somewhere
within reasonable distance of the portion of the coast where they would
be most likely to land, we ought to find ruins having all the chief
characteristics of their architecture, with figures for the most part
typical of their race in face and feature, in costume and ornament, and
such ruins should be very distinctly differentiated from those deeper in
the country, and erected after the invaders had been some time in
contact with the natives, whose own mode of living and disposition would
modify the orientalism of the designs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account