The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel: Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers.Prescott, Thomas H.
History
The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel: Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers.
Prescott, Thomas H.
Biography; World history
The whole country is naturally divided into three parts――Upper Egypt,
bordering on what was anciently Ethiopia; Middle Egypt; and Lower
Egypt, including the Delta of the Nile. In each there were numerous
cities in which the population was amassed: originally Thebes, a city
of Upper Egypt, of the size of which surprising accounts are
transmitted to us, and whose ruins still astonish the traveler, was
the capital of the country; but latterly, as commerce increased,
Memphis in Middle Egypt became the seat of power. After Thebes and
Memphis, Ombi, Edfou, Esneh, Elephantina, and Philoe seem to have been
the most important of the Egyptian cities.
Our accounts of the Egyptian civilization are derived chiefly from the
Greek historian Herodotus (B. C. 408), who visited Egypt and digested
the information which he received from the priests as to its ancient
history; and Manetho, a native Egyptian of later times, who wrote in
Greek. From their accounts it is inferred that the country was
anciently divided into thirty-six sections or provinces called
_nomes_――ten in Upper, sixteen in Middle, and ten in Lower Egypt.
‘Many of the separate nomes were of considerable substantive
importance, and had a marked local character each to itself, religious
as well as political; though the whole of Egypt, from Elephantine to
Pelusium and Kanopus, is said to have always constituted one kingdom.’
Of this kingdom, the population, according to a rough estimate, may
have been about seven millions. The government was a monarchy based on
an all-powerful priesthood, similar to the Brahminical system of
India; and, as in India, the most striking feature in the Egyptian
society was the division of the people into hereditary castes. ‘The
population of Egypt,’ says Mr Grote in his History of Greece, ‘was
classified into certain castes or hereditary professions, of which the
number is represented differently by different authors. The priests
stand clearly marked out as the order richest, most powerful, and most
venerated, distributed all over the country, and possessing
exclusively the means of reading and writing, besides a vast amount of
narrative matter treasured up in the memory, the whole stock of
medical and physical knowledge then attainable, and those rudiments of
geometry (or rather land-measuring) which were so often called into
use in a country annually inundated. To each god and to each temple
throughout Egypt, lands and other properties belonged, whereby the
numerous band of priests attached to him were maintained. Their
ascendancy, both direct and indirect, over the minds of the people was
immense; they prescribed that minute ritual under which the life of
every Egyptian, not excepting the king himself, was passed, and which
was for themselves more full of harassing particularities than for any
one else. Every day in the year belonged to some particular god, and
the priests alone knew to which. There were different gods in every
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account