Cardiff giant; Geology -- New York (State) -- Onondaga County
Those familiar with the frauds practised in other countries in
the manufacture and sale of antiques, and perhaps others, would
have a vague suspicion that this might furnish another instance,
nearer home. My own mind was not free from such dreams. And
notwithstanding the apparent impossibility of finding a place
where such a stone might be obtained--of quarrying, working,
transporting, and burying the same, and keeping it a profound
secret, I still had my suspicions. But the first look at the
statue dispels from the mind every thought of that nature. It has
the marks of the ages stamped upon every limb and feature, in a
manner and with a distinctness which no art can imitate. I have
not seen the first person who entertained any doubt of its great
antiquity, after looking at that most wonderful and inexplicable
figure. The time spent in manufacturing and retailing the simple
and absurd rumors which circulate through the community and find
their way into the papers, is weakly and foolishly thrown away. It
is a serious and most remarkable reality, and one which as yet
have received no satisfactory explanation, and probably never will.
IS IT A STATUE OR A PETRIFACTION?
Serious doubts are really entertained on this subject, and it is
elaborately discussed. I must confess that I have none whatever,
and for the following reasons:
First--There is no satisfactory evidence that any one person ever
lived in any age or country of this world, of the statue of ten feet,
unless it be Goliah of Gath. I know very well what is claimed and
said on this subject, but the evidence would not satisfy a jury
of intelligent men.
Second--There is nothing in the general aspect, which leads any
one to think it anything but stone. I venture to say, that were
it in any other form, such a supposition would never have arisen.
Third--The stratification of the stone is perfectly visible, even
to the imperfect observation now allowed. Mr. Calthrop's letter
is full and satisfactory on this subject, but in addition to the
places pointed out by him, the stratification may be seen on the
left shoulder, and I think on the top of the head. That upon the
left breast is, however, most clear, distinct and satisfactory.
Fourth--The whole statue, in all its parts, furnishes the most
conclusive evidence, that it was all cut from one stone. It is
quite clear that the stone has been cut away just far enough and
only just far enough to show the legs, the arms and the fingers.
Fifth--The fracture of the stone along the left leg,, and especially
on the heel of the left foot, which seems to be recent and fresh,
is the fracture of our common gypsum, and leaves no doubt, so far
as the eye can determine, that the material is stone.
It is said that on striking the head or the chest, it gives forth
a sound indicating that the statue is hollow. Such evidence must
in any event be very uncertain, and now no such experiments are
permitted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account