The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist: An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern ConfederacyAbel, Annie Heloise
History
The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist: An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy
Abel, Annie Heloise
Indian Territory; Slavery -- United States; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
It is not the province of the Cherokees to determine the character of
the conflict going on in the States. It is their duty to keep
themselves, if possible, disentangled, and afford no grounds to either
party to interfere with their rights. The obligations of every
character, pecuniary and otherwise, which existed prior to the present
state of affairs between the Cherokee Nation and the Government are
equally valid now as then. If the Government owe us, I do not believe
it will repudiate its debts. If States embraced in the Confederacy owe
us, I do not believe they will repudiate their debts. I consider our
annuity safe in any contingency.
A comparison of Northern and Southern philanthropy, as illustrated in
their dealings toward the Indians within their respective limits,
would not affect the merits of the question now under consideration,
which is simply one of duty under existing circumstances. I therefore
pass it over, merely remarking that the "settled policy" of former
years was a favorite policy with both sections when extended to the
acquisition of Indian lands, and that but few Indians now press their
feet upon the banks of either the Ohio or the Tennessee....
Judging from all the instructions that Secretary Walker sent out on Indian
matters in May of 1861, it would seem that he had very much at heart the
enlistment of the Indians and their actual participation in the war.
Mention has already been made of how General McCulloch was told by
Adjutant-general Cooper to add, if possible, two Indian regiments to his
brigade and of how Walker had written Hubbard urging him to persuade the
Indians to join forces and raising the number of Indian regiments desired
from two to three. In a similar strain Walker wrote[237] to Douglas H.
Cooper on the occasion of definitely asking him to give his services to
the South. In all these letters no special stress was laid upon an
intention to use the Indians as home guards exclusively. On the contrary,
one might easily draw, from the letters, a quite opposite inference and
conclude that the Indian troops, if raised, were to be used very generally
and exactly as any other volunteers might be used. This is important in
view of the stand, and a very positive one it was, that Albert Pike took
some time afterwards. In his own letter[238] to Johnson of May 11, 1861,
he does not specifically say that the Indian soldiers, whose mustering he
has in contemplation, are not to be used outside of the Indian country;
but he does insist that that country be occupied by them and by a certain
number of white regiments--another important point as subsequent events
will divulge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account