ARIZONA │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 1 Ft. │Less tuberculosis│No. (No diseases │Few, government Defiance │and trachoma. │treated properly │regulation. │ │at home). │ │ │ │ No. 2 Parker │Records do not │No. │Eight, in last │show it. │ │three years. │ │ │ No. 3 Phoenix │Increased, I │ │ │think. │ │ │ │ │ No. 4 Sacaton │No reliable │Not generally. │Not able to │statistics. │ │state. │ │ │ No. 5 St. │No. │No diseases │Few; tuberculosis Michaels │ │treated at home. │cases. │ │ │ No. 6 Tucson │Cannot answer. │Yes and No. │Very few. │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 7 │There is. │Tuberculosis, │Many. │ │discharged. │ │ │Trachoma, treated│ │ │in schools. │ ─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼───────────────── CALIFORNIA │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 1 Banning │No. │Yes, sent home to│Not many. │ │die. │ │ │ │ No. 2 Campo │No. │No proper │One case on │ │treatment at │account of │ │home. │sickness. │ │ │ No. 3 Covelo │No. │No. No treatment │Comparatively │ │at home. │few. │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 4 El Cujon │No. │No. │No. │ │ │ No. 5 Greenville │I think not. │No. │Probably about │ │ │twenty. │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 6 Likely │Yes, much more. │No. │No. │ │ │ No. 7 Pala │There is much │ │Percentage very