│more than five │ │small. │years ago. │ │ │ │ │ No. 8 Ukiah │Not to my │ │ │knowledge. │ │ │ │ │ No. 9 Yuma Yuma │No. │No. │No. │ │ │ No. 10 N. │I would say not │By law, must be │Not many. California │so prevalent. │sent home. │ │ │Necessary in few │ │ │cases. │ ─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼───────────────── COLORADO │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 1 Navaho │No data. │No treatment at │No data. Springs │ │home. │ ─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼───────────────── NO. DAKOTA │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 1 Elbowoods │We have looked │No. │No tuberculosis │into the │ │or trachoma cases │condition more, │ │admitted. │that is all, I │ │ │think. │ │ │ │ │ No. 2 Elbowoods │Yes, I believe │ │None of late. │there is. │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 3 Ft. Yates │Less frequent │No. │Few. │now. │ │ │ │ │ No. 4 Standing │Greatly │Not sent home │ Rock │increased. │soon enough. │ │ │ │ ─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼───────────────── SO. DAKOTA │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 1 Cheyenne │I think so, at │I think not. │Not a great many. │least more of it │ │ │is known. │ │ │ │ │ No. 2 Crow Creek │I do not think │No. │ │so. │ │ │ │ │ No. 3 Flandreau │More │ │ │satisfactory. │ │ │ │ │ No. 4 Greenwood │About the same. │No treatment at │Not many.