Some suggestions as to organization and management of auxiliaries are here made in the hope that they may be helpful. In many places the sewing society, devoted to parish work, may take in addition the Home Mission work, if it is as agreeable to the members as it has been found to be in many cases already. At each meeting, some one previously appointed may communicate intelligence of Home Mission work, while others sew. In other places the old cent society to which our grandmothers belonged is available as the channel for contributions. In other places still, a wholly separate organization may be most advisable, in which the filling of Home Mission boxes, the collection of money for the W. H. M. A., and the communication of intelligence as to Home Mission work may be the only objects of the society. The regular Woman’s Prayer Meeting might well set apart one meeting each month where they are held weekly, or a meeting at longer intervals when they occur less frequently; this monthly or quarterly meeting to be devoted to prayer and conversation about the spread of the Gospel in our own country. At these meetings a collection may be taken and there may be a treasurer to receive this, and an officer, either secretary or president, to preside at the meeting. It is not necessary that these officers should serve no other organizations, since the same person not infrequently acts as an officer in one or more societies and keeps the business of each by itself. It seems wise, however, whenever a sufficient number of persons can be obtained, to have separate officers for different organizations. The end to be attained is that there be a definite, separate time given to praying and working for the cause of the evangelization of our own country, and a definite, separate contribution arranged so that each woman of the church may have just the channel at hand by which to send her own offering for this cause direct to its destination. And further, may we not ask those churches that have adopted the system of weekly offerings, known as the “Harris plan,” to put this Association also on their list, to make this one of the channels of distribution through which individual members of the church show their desire and accomplish their purpose of co-operating in Christ’s work of saving men? It is no longer—if it ever ought to have been—the age in which Christian men and women should wait to be stirred, to be urged, even to be invited, to give. Does it not become each of us to find out by calculation, careful, generous calculation, how much we can afford to the specific work of spreading the Gospel; and then through what channels we can best effect our object? And if this is done by all will there not be some who will wish to send part of their funds through this society, whose work is, directly, for the women and children of our country?