The American Missionary — Volume 39, No. 07, July, 1885Various
History
The American Missionary — Volume 39, No. 07, July, 1885
Various
Congregational churches -- Missions -- Periodicals; Home missions -- Periodicals
Your committee appointed to report upon the speech of Secretary
Powell beg leave to call attention to but one of the many points
of interest in the address. That is, that the American
Missionary Association is now in debt to the amount of $30,000,
and that unless special efforts are made by the churches, the
end of the year will see a debt of $40,000. It is manifest that
this will necessarily mean the suspension of some forms of
mission work, the crippling of others and the sad embarrassment
of this grand organization for years to come. It _need_ not be;
it _ought_ not to be; if Christian men and women do their duty,
it _will_ not be. Your committee therefore propose this
resolution:
_Resolved_, That we, the members of this association, will
individually urge upon the churches under our charge the duty of
making earnest and special efforts during the remainder of the
year to relieve the American Missionary Association from this
impending calamity.
* * * * *
"GRAVE OF LOVEJOY"--CORRECTION.
EDITOR AMERICAN MISSIONARY.--DEAR SIR: Did Brother Imes (June No., p.
168) misunderstand Father Johnson, or has the old man forgotten?
There was no "hasty burial by the river." The body remained all night
in the warehouse, was taken to the house the next day and buried from
the house in the cemetery. Johnson dug two graves there; the first in
a spot afterward taken for a road or walk, and the second where the
remains now lie. The memorial tablet was put there in good faith by
an editor of Alton, who greatly admired Lovejoy's defense of the
freedom of the press. But will there never be a more appropriate
monument? Is "Spare him now he is buried" all that is ever to be said
over the grave of Elijah P. Lovejoy?
H. L. HAMMOND.
* * * * *
WHAT SHALL WE DO WITH THE CHINESE?
A momentous, an urgent, and a very hard question!
_Exclude them_, said the politicians, and close out thus forever the
problem their presence involves. This seems, at first sight, a simple
and easy, albeit a rather rough, answer. And so the Exclusion bill
became a law. But it is almost certain that there are more Chinese in
America to-day because of that law than there would have been without
it. They came in such great numbers after the law was enacted and
before it went into operation that (as I think) the decrease in
immigration since that date has not as yet offset that increase.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account