The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological studyMichaud, Régis
History
The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological study
Michaud, Régis
American fiction -- History and criticism; Psychological fiction, American -- History and criticism; Social problems in literature
This classical portrait of the latter-day American æsthete is being
modified under our very eyes. He is no longer in 1927 what he was in
1924. And of what will to-morrow be made? The American æsthete, model
1927, is much less bothered with erotica than his predecessor, and
like the husky child who beats his nurse, he is strong enough to shake
off the foreign yoke. Even in literature alliances have been broken,
if we are to believe Mr. William Carlos Williams, who published (in
France naturally and in a _de luxe_ edition) his delicious collection
of improvisations called “The Great American Novel.”[61] In the tone
of the inner monologue, and with a fanatic passion which does not
exclude humor, Mr. Williams makes a plea of “America for Americans” in
literature.
Europe is nothing to us. Simply nothing. Their music is death to us.
Do not imagine I do not see the necessity of learning from
Europe--or China, but we will learn what we will, and never what
they would teach us. America is a mass of pulp, a jelly, a
sensitive plant ready to take whatever print you want to put on it.
We have no art, no manners, no intellect--we have nothing. We water
at the eyes at our own stupidity. We have only mass movement like a
sea. But we are not a sea.
Europe we must--we have no words. Every word we get must be broken
off from the European mass. Every word we get placed over again by
some delicate hand. Piece by piece we must loosen what we want.
What we will have. Will they let it go? Hugh.
But William Carlos Williams has faith in America. According to him,
the art of to-morrow, American art _par excellence_, will be of the
“flamboyant” type. America is seeking new openings for her aspirations.
Is she as much of a Philistine as she is supposed to be? The American
who lives a model and edifying life (three meals a day, breakfast in
bed, new paper on the walls), that American at times emigrates to the
circus _en masse_, as Whitman used to say, to watch men, women and
animals executing exquisitely impossible tricks. What could be more
“flamboyant” than the trapeze man being projected into the air, and the
tiger jumping through man-made hoops, or the elephant upholding his
full weight by balancing his front legs on bottles? What could be more
“flamboyant” than the painted clown, eternal symbol of the human race,
laughing in order not to cry, and grimacing while making a thousand
grim jokes with small men all around him accomplishing their marvelous
feats?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account