The American Occupation of the Philippines 1898-1912Blount, James H. (James Henderson)
History
The American Occupation of the Philippines 1898-1912
Blount, James H. (James Henderson)
Philippines -- History -- 1898-1946; Philippines -- Politics and government -- 1898-1935
There is hardly a single island in the group from which you cannot
shoot across to one or more of the others--scarcely another
archipelago in the world in which the islands are crowded so
closely together and so interdependent.
This explains also why the Filipino people are a people. Whenever
the American people understand that, they will give them their
independence, unless they get an idea that government of their people
by their people for their people would be distasteful to them.
In the memorandum of their views telegraphed to Washington on October
25th, Messrs. Davis, Frye, and Reid also say:
Public opinion in Europe, including that of Rome, expects us to
retain whole of Philippine Islands.
Archbishop Chapelle was in Paris at the time of these negotiations. He
afterwards told the writer in Manila that he got that $20,000,000 put
in the Treaty of Paris. The Church preferred that our title should be
a title by purchase rather than a title by conquest, and Mr. McKinley
was vigorously urging the latter. Between the legal effects of the
two, there is a world of difference. The Church outgeneralled the
President--checkmated him with a bishop. Look at that part of the
treaty which affects church property:
Article VIII. The * * * cession * * * cannot in any respect impair
the property or rights * * * of * * * ecclesiastical * * * bodies.
The Church of Rome, or at least some of the ecclesiastical
bodies pertaining to it in the Philippines, owned the cream of the
agricultural estates. By the treaty they have not lost a dollar. It
might have been otherwise, had not Mr. McKinley's original claim of
title by conquest been overcome at Paris.
Judge Day's memorandum of his own views, telegraphed on October 25th
along with those of his colleagues, stated that he was unable to agree
that we should peremptorily demand the entire Philippine group; that
In the spirit of our instructions, and bearing in mind the often
declared disinterestedness of purpose and freedom from designs
of conquest with which the war was undertaken, we should be
consistent in demands in making peace * * * with due regard to
our responsibility because of the conduct of our military and
naval authorities in dealing with the insurgents.
Again, he says:
We cannot leave the insurgents either to form a government [he of
course did not know what a complete government they had already
formed] or to battle against a foe which * * * might readily
overcome them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account