The American Occupation of the Philippines 1898-1912Blount, James H. (James Henderson)
History
The American Occupation of the Philippines 1898-1912
Blount, James H. (James Henderson)
Philippines -- History -- 1898-1946; Philippines -- Politics and government -- 1898-1935
He also was of course unaware how thoroughly anxious the Spaniards then
in the Philippines were to get away, and how completely they were at
the mercy of the new Philippine Republic and its forces. "On all hands"
says Judge Day, "it is agreed that the inhabitants of the islands are
unfit for self-government." Of course we knew absolutely nothing worth
mentioning about the Filipinos at that time. Judge Day then proposes,
for the reasons indicated, to accept Luzon and some adjacent islands,
as being of "strategic advantage," and to leave Spain the rest, with
a "treaty stipulation for non-alienation without the consent of the
United States." It seems to me that Judge Day's scheme was the least
desirable of all.
Senator Gray's memorandum of the same date is a red-hot argument
against taking over any part of the archipelago. He begins thus:
The undersigned cannot agree that it is wise to take Philippine
Islands in whole or in part. To do so would be to reverse
accepted continental policy of the country, declared and acted
upon through our history. * * * It will make necessary * * *
immense sums for fortifications and harbors * * * Climate and
social conditions demoralizing to character of American youth * * *.
On whole, instead of indemnity, injury * * *. Cannot agree that
any obligation incurred to insurgents * * *. If we had captured
Cadiz and Carlists had helped us, would not be our duty to stay by
them at the conclusion of war * * *. No place for * * * government
of subject people in American system * * *. Even conceding all
benefits claimed for annexation, we thereby abandon * * * the moral
grandeur and strength to be gained by keeping our word to nations
of the world * * * for doubtful material advantages and shameful
stepping down from high moral position boastfully assumed. * * *
Now that we have achieved all and more than our object, let us
simply keep our word * * *. Above all let us not make a mockery
of the [President's] instructions, where, after stating that we
took up arms only in obedience to the dictates of humanity * * *
and that we had no designs of aggrandizement and no ambition for
conquest, the President * * * eloquently says: "It is my earnest
wish that the United States in making peace should follow the
same high rule of conduct which guided it in facing war."
The next day, October 26th, came this laconic answer:
The cession must be of the whole archipelago or none. The latter
is wholly inadmissible and the former must be required.
Probably the one thing about the Paris Peace negotiations that is
sure to interest the average American most at this late date is the
matter of how we came to pay that twenty millions. It was this way. On
October 27th, the Commission wired Washington:
Last night Spanish ambassador called upon Mr. Reid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account