The _general_ configuration of the head was not less interesting than the particular developments. Whilst the heads of highly moral and intellectual men generally measure from one and a half to three inches more from Individuality to Philoprogenitiveness than from Destructiveness to Destructiveness, _his_ head was nearly round. The coronal region was poorly developed. The sides of the head were bulged out to an extraordinary extent, whilst it was flattened behind, evidently indicating deficient social feelings. The cerebral fibres were very short from the ear to the organs in the anterior lobe of the brain, as well as from the ear to Adhesiveness and Philoprogenitiveness. His head was somewhat above the average size. His body was strong and well built, yet the quality of his organisation was rather gross. His temperament was principally lymphatic bilious, with some of the sanguine, but scarcely any traces of the nervous.[3] Such a temperament is much more favourable to the exercise of physical than mental power, and to the manifestations of the animal propensities than of the moral sentiments and the intellectual faculties. Having observed the organisation of the body, and of the _general_ form of the head, I commenced a minute comparison of the relative size of the respective organs. The result is as follows:— Amativeness, full. Philoprogenitiveness, average. Adhesiveness, moderate. Inhabitiveness, full. Concentrativeness, large. Combativeness, large. Destructiveness, very large.+ Alimentiveness, large. Acquisitiveness, very large.+ Secretiveness, very large. Cautiousness, large. Approbativeness, moderate. Self-esteem, very large. Firmness, very large. Conscientiousness, small. Hope, large. Marvellousness, moderate. Veneration, full. Benevolence, moderate. Imitation, average. Ideality, small. Constructiveness, full. Mirthfulness, moderate. Individuality, full. Form, full. Size, large. Weight, full. Colour, moderate. Order, average. Calculation, full. Locality, large. Eventuality, average. Tune, uncertain. Time, ” Language, average. Causality, ” Comparison, ”