The American Quarterly Review, No. 18, June 1831 (Vol 9)Various
History
The American Quarterly Review, No. 18, June 1831 (Vol 9)
Various
Intellectual life -- Periodicals; United States -- Intellectual life -- 19th century -- Periodicals
"Now I ask," says he, "how much even Professor Gauss, _le
plus grand des mathematiciens_, as _La Grange_ called him,
has realized from his lectures? Mathematics, at least the
higher branches of them, never can be very popular; I mean,
it is impossible that they should be generally studied, and
it would be to consign a professor to absolute indigence, if
government should leave professors of mathematics dependent
on the honorarium paid by their students. I studied
mathematics under the celebrated Pfaff at Halle, whom _La
Grange_ called _un des premiers mathematiciens_, and we were
never more than twenty in his lecture room, of whom I fully
believe not much more than half paid the _honorarium_, which
was very small." P. 58.
And again,--
"Yet I believe, that generally speaking, it is better for
professors and students to have fees paid for their
lectures, for various reasons, although it would be unsafe
to let professors be solely or chiefly depending upon them,
for it would be unsafe to settle such annuities upon persons
intended to live for science, or guarantee them, forever, an
easy life. It has besides been found, that generally,
students attend those lectures more carefully for which they
pay. With the different branches of instruction, the
principle upon which professorships are to be established,
ought to vary. In a city, in which many students of medicine
always will be assembled, it may be safe to let the
professor greatly depend upon the fees of the students,
whilst a professor of Hebrew ought to be provided for in
such a way, that he may follow the difficult study of
Oriental languages, without the direct care for his support,
in case the number of students would be too small for this
purpose, as it generally will prove." P. 65.
In most of our colleges, the president has some control over the course
of education in the schools of the institution; and, consequently, over
the professors. Such a plan is, however, impolitic. No control whatever
ought to be exerted over the teacher. If qualified--and if not he is not
fitted for his situation--he ought to be left to himself, and to follow
that system which he conceives best adapted to develop the intellect of
his pupils; at the same time he should be held rigidly responsible for
his free agency. In the University of Virginia, as well as in other of
the higher schools of the country, the professor is required to send in
a weekly report of the number of lectures he has delivered; the daily
examinations instituted; the length of time occupied in each; and this
report of the mode in which his duties have been executed, is laid
before the board of visitors at their next meeting. In this manner
delinquencies can be detected, and the appropriate corrective be
applied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account