The American Revolution and the Boer War, An Open Letter to Mr. Charles Francis Adams on His Pamphlet "The Confederacy and the Transvaal"Fisher, Sydney George
History
The American Revolution and the Boer War, An Open Letter to Mr. Charles Francis Adams on His Pamphlet "The Confederacy and the Transvaal"
Fisher, Sydney George
Adams, Charles Francis, 1835-1915. Confederacy and the Transvaal; South African War, 1899-1902
"Under so many discouraging circumstances, can virtue, can honor,
can the love of your country prompt you to persevere. Humanity
itself (and sure I am humanity is no stranger to your breast) calls
upon you to desist. Your army must perish for want of common
necessaries, or thousands of innocent families must perish to
support them. Wherever they encamp the country must be
impoverished. Wherever they march the troops of Britain will pursue
and must complete the devastation which America herself has begun."
"Perhaps it may be said, 'it is better to die than to be slaves.'
This indeed is a splendid maxim in theory: and perhaps in some
instances, may be found experimentally true. But where there is the
least probability of a happy accommodation surely wisdom and
humanity call for some sacrifices to be made to prevent inevitable
destruction."
It reads almost as if you had written it yourself, does it not? It
raised the whole question fairly and squarely, the whole question of the
moral right of a naturally separated people to struggle for independence
to the bitter end, the last ditch, extermination or whatever name you
choose to give it, or as in the case of Ireland, the Armenians and the
Poles without end.
I do not mean to say that that was the only time that Washington had had
the question brought squarely before him. It was a question that came up
all over the country every day for seven years down to within a few
months of the surrender of Cornwallis in 1781; for the year 1780 was as
you know the darkest hour in our revolution. Every individual in those
seven years had that question before him every day and hour, and as
individuals settled it for themselves one way or the other they dropped
in and out of the two sides of the contest.
How did Washington settle it with Duche? The young clergyman made a
powerful appeal to him. He said that the whole solution of the war
rested with Washington alone. He alone could stop the fighting. He alone
could persuade the other leaders in the name of God and humanity to give
up a hopeless contest. This was somewhat of an exaggeration. The war was
deeper than Washington just as the Boer war is deeper than Kruger. But
never mind that. Duche's idea was that Washington should at the head of
his army negotiate for some settlement short of independence.
Independence, England would never grant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account