The American Therapist. Vol. II. No. 7. Jan. 15th, 1894: A Monthly Record of Modern Therapeutics, with Practical Suggestions Relating to the Clinical Applications of Drugs.Various
Science
The American Therapist. Vol. II. No. 7. Jan. 15th, 1894: A Monthly Record of Modern Therapeutics, with Practical Suggestions Relating to the Clinical Applications of Drugs.
Various
Drug utilization -- Periodicals; Drugs -- Periodicals
(_b_) If it acts as a cathartic equally as efficient as it does when the
nerves are intact, this shows that it does not act as a cathartic
through the cerebral centres. The action is either on some of the
abdominal ganglia, or on the local intestinal mechanism.
[Illustration: FIG. 6.]
(_c_) If it acts as a cathartic, but much weaker than when the nerves
are intact, this shows that it acts both upon the cerebral centres and
also on some part of the remaining mechanism. This action on the
cerebral centers may be direct, or it may be reflex from irritation of
the intestinal mucous membrane. So far as I have read, no experiments
have been made to determine when the action is direct and when reflex.
It seems probable, though, that something might be learned about it in
the following way, which is illustrated by Fig. 6. Select two similar
starved animals; open abdomens of both and expose one carotid artery in
one of them. Inject a solution of the cathartic in the exposed carotid
and an equal solution in the exposed intestinal loop of the other
animal. Place animals in salt solution in tin vat so as to observe
through incision the intestines.
(1) If the drug acts reflexly by irritation of the intestinal mucous
membrane, it will act quicker in the animal in which the drug was
injected into the intestinal canal (see Fig. 6), because it is there to
begin action at once, while in the other it must first be excreted into
the intestinal canal. The intestine can be observed easily in the salt
solution.
(2) If the drug acts directly upon the cerebral centres, it will act
quicker in the animal in which it was injected into carotid artery,
because in the other animal it has to be absorbed and diffused through
the general circulation before it reaches the centre. Clamping the aorta
would make this more accurate were it not that the intestines are so
easily disturbed by changing the circulation.
[Illustration: FIG. 7.]
(3) Exclude the abdominal ganglia. This can be done either by
extirpating the ganglia, or by using a piece of excised living
intestine. (Fig. 7 represents the abdominal ganglia concerned
destroyed.) After extirpating the ganglia, and performing tracheotomy,
and injecting the cathartic into the small or large intestine, place the
animal in a physiological salt solution in tin vat, and observe the
action of the drug. This experiment is not very satisfactory, because
the vessels are greatly dilated.
(_a_) If the drug does not excite peristalsis, this shows that it acts
through the abdominal or cerebral centres. This action may be direct or
reflex.
(_b_) If the drug excites equally as strong peristalsis as are produced
when the ganglia are intact, this shows that its action is not on the
abdominal ganglia but on the intestine.
(_c_) If the drug excites weaker peristalsis, this shows that it acts at
both places. This may be direct or reflex.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account